Begin by encouraging open discussion among team members, ensuring each individual has an opportunity to voice their concerns, share their perspective, and propose potential solutions. Prioritize tasks by assessing the overall project objectives, determining critical milestones, and evaluating the impact of adjusting deadlines to find a mutually agreeable timeline. Foster collaboration by exploring compromises, reallocating resources if necessary, and maintaining a focus on the shared goal of successfully completing the project. By promoting open dialogue, prioritizing effectively, and nurturing teamwork, you can efficiently navigate conflicting timelines and ensure project deadlines are met.

To navigate conflicting timelines between team members, start by meeting with each member individually to understand their perspectives. Then, facilitate a joint meeting for open communication, allowing them to express concerns and listen actively. Focus on common goals to shift attention from personal deadlines to collective objectives. Assess project priorities to determine which deadlines are critical and collaborate on solutions, like adjusting timelines or redistributing tasks. Once a resolution is reached, clarify expectations and document changes. Regular follow-ups can help monitor progress and address any new challenges, promoting a culture of flexibility to reduce future conflicts.

In terms of deadlines that often cause conflicts, it is natural. It is how we control and resolve it. The way that can be done at the beginning is to emphasize the objectives, and then discuss them together. After that, you can do the priority order of important work first, then evaluate and make decisions.

Normally i advise project managers to plan in this ratio by cutting the 100% task cake into these 4 phases / pieces. in this ration 35:25:30:10 So that during the last phase of the project you literally should have lesser weight to balance and go live with the project.

When I'm handling deadline conflicts between my team members, I use a straightforward approach: I call a quick huddle to hear both sides openly - no pointing fingers. I map out what each person needs and check the critical deadlines that can't move. Then, I help them find middle ground, whether that's shifting some tasks around or bringing in extra help. For example, I might say: "I hear both your concerns. Let's look at what's truly urgent and see where we can be flexible." I always document our agreed solution and schedule brief check-ins to keep things on track. Remember - it's not about who's right, but what's right for the project.