How do you manage your time and emotions when working on multiple feedback rounds on your scientific papers?

A prevalent error that authors often make when receiving "negative" feedback on their papers is attempting to resubmit the same paper to a different journal without addressing the feedback received. Feedback can elicit various emotions, including anger, frustration, or disappointment. While these emotions are natural and relatable, it is crucial to take a step back, carefully review the feedback, and comprehend the primary points and suggestions before proceeding. There is always room for improvement.

To manage time and emotions during multiple feedback rounds on scientific papers, prioritize tasks, practice mindfulness for emotional regulation, communicate effectively, learn from feedback, and prioritize self-care.

Feedback is a critical part of the scientific process aimed at improving the quality and clarity of your paper. Reviewers are experts in your field who volunteer their time to help refine your work. Approach feedback as an opportunity to learn and enhance your research. Remember, feedback is not personal; it focuses on improving the paper to meet journal and scientific community standards.

In fact, many research projects started from a collaborative and respectful review process. And who knows, perhaps your reviewer might even become your boss one day!

Feedback is aimed at improving the quality and clarity of your paper. Reviewers are experts who volunteer their time to help you refine your work. Approach feedback as a learning opportunity and a way to enhance your research.

When you receive feedback, take the time to read it thoroughly and understand the main points and suggestions. Group the feedback into categories such as major issues, minor issues, stylistic issues, or specific sections. This organization helps prioritize tasks and plan revisions effectively, ensuring a systematic approach to addressing the feedback.

Take time to read and understand the feedback. Group feedback into categories: major issues, minor issues, stylistic issues, specific sections. Prioritize tasks and plan your revisions systematically.

In my experience, with my first round of revisions, I used to get so nervous. I had this instinct inside of me that English is not my first language and was always terrified to make one tiny mistake. However, I started to notice that the more feedback I get, the more clarity I get in my writing. I think the feedback is critical in order to get improved.

For each comment or suggestion, decide whether to accept, reject, or negotiate it. Accept feedback that improves the paper and is feasible to implement. Reject feedback if you have strong evidence or logical reasons to support your original approach. Negotiate feedback by proposing compromises or alternative solutions if you partially agree. Always explain your responses and support them with evidence or examples.

Decide whether to accept, reject, or negotiate each comment or suggestion. Accept feedback that improves the paper and is feasible to implement. Reject feedback if you have strong evidence or logical reasons to support your original approach. Negotiate feedback by proposing compromises or alternative solutions if you partially agree. Always explain your responses and support them with evidence or examples.

What is important here, is that you have every right to kindly disagree with the reviewer. After all, you conduct a scientific debate. And in science, more often than not, there are multiple approaches to the same problem. To counterbalance the point in which you disagree, you can kindly thank the reviewer every time they make creative and constructive points that will make your work better.

Managing time and emotions during multiple feedback rounds on scientific papers can be challenging. ??It's important to stay organized by setting a schedule with clear deadlines for each round of revisions. ??If a paper is poorly written, take a break and return with a fresh perspective to improve clarity and coherence. ??Always make sure to follow the journal’s guidelines closely, this saves time and avoids unnecessary revisions. ??If feedback suggests that the paper doesn't make a significant contribution, take it as a chance to strengthen your arguments or add more relevant data. Remember, it's better to review and resubmit a stronger paper than to rush through revisions.

Effective time management is crucial when revising your paper, especially during multiple feedback rounds. Set realistic goals and deadlines for each task and adhere to them. Use tools like calendars, timers, or task management apps to track progress. Break down revisions into smaller, manageable steps to avoid feeling overwhelmed and ensure steady progress.

Set realistic goals and deadlines for each task and adhere to them. Use tools like calendars, timers, or task management apps to track progress. Break down revisions into smaller, manageable steps to avoid feeling overwhelmed and ensure steady progress.

Receiving feedback can trigger emotions such as frustration, anger, or anxiety. Acknowledge these emotions and find healthy ways to express them. Talk to supportive colleagues, friends, or counselors, and engage in stress-relief activities like exercise, meditation, or hobbies. Remember, feedback is aimed at improving your work, not criticizing you personally.

Acknowledge emotions such as frustration, anger, or anxiety, and find healthy ways to express them. Talk to supportive colleagues, friends, or counselors, and engage in stress-relief activities like exercise, meditation, or hobbies. Remember, feedback is aimed at improving your work, not criticizing you personally.

Also, remember that reviewers "didn't mean it." Words written on paper often seem harsh compared to the same text told to you in person and with a smile. The reviewers critically assess your work, not you as a research nor as a person. Think about it this way: the more time the reviewer invests in the review and the more comments they give you, the more potential they see and the more they trust that you will improve.

Feedback is an excellent tool for improving your writing skills. By addressing feedback, you learn to communicate your ideas more clearly, structure your paper logically, and use evidence and citations appropriately. Proactively seek feedback from co-authors, mentors, and peers before submitting your paper. Regular feedback helps you refine your writing and become a better researcher.

Feedback helps you communicate ideas more clearly, structure your paper logically, and use evidence and citations appropriately. Proactively seek feedback from co-authors, mentors, and peers before submitting your paper. Regular feedback helps you refine your writing and become a better researcher.