How do you balance self-paced and instructor-led training?

You can go as quickly or as slowly as needed. You can pause and take as detailed notes as you like. You are not stuck in one place or time to do your course

Self-paced training is great for in depth and high cognitive function/deep learning where one needs to critically assimilate advanced or linked concepts into your own mental frameworks. In essence, this is deep thoughts taking the material and turning it into your own words. While this is useful for practice and fundamental concepts, training should at some point simulate the stress of a real working environment in order to benefit and prepare the person. This is also great for reflective work, analysis, argument forming, research and essay work.

Self-paced is excellent for a topic or subject you are familiar with through experience. It allows you to use your existing knowledge to complete training at your own pace, which in today's Society is of substantial benefit

1- Take notes from your mentor but manage solving problems by your way. 2- Make steps as easy as you can. 3- Stay with the customer until the issue is solved to make customer satisfaction.

You can do it at your own pace and comfort Explore more on the topic you are getting trained for Try to apply it on your real time scenarios Cons: If you are stuck at a point that needs more insights and you are not clear even after searching may put you in lag and make you search of a mentor. But learning in depth by oneself is really really helpful and make you go deep in the topic and make you an SME

Instructor-led training works well in smaller groups and when the material is crafted to include the learner. Gone are the days of lecture based training being normal, that doesnt help for knowledge retention. The real benefit to using instructor-led training is when you have material designed to engage the learner and bring them along for an experience while still learning core skills. I have found this method of training to be very beneficial for softer skills or areas where you want collaboration in key activities to promote core learning.

I have come discover to discover that with a lot of focus and diligence, I only need to give my undivided attention and let time take its course. Subsequently I get to ask questions where not clear and often contribute meaningfully . That way I and my instructor achieve our aims and objectives.

In my experience an Instructor led training has potential higher effect as you are directly involved in the conversation with an expert. Being from F&B it has a huge impact cause most of the trainings are practical, so you can have a hands on experience on the spot.

Instructor led training is great for hands on training where events,procedures and protocols need to be practiced and learned. It can also more effectively control the stress levels if the student enabling the instructor to scaffold the training to the learners level and building them up where they struggle. This type of training does not work well with deep cognitive work but rather with practical elements requiring hands on work. Another benefit of this is that it creates the opportunity for simulation where scenarios can be developed to challenge the student.

Instructor~Led training, wether active or passive, is most effective as the trainee is provided an opportunity to feel the entire presentation with all of the nuances that one would not get in an individual, self paced program. He sees the instructors expressions and his active body language that supports his excitement. However an instructor must immediately know his audience. Some say “hold your questions until the end of the presentation”. This is an easy way of killing excitement and interest. Instead, invite conversation and pertinent discussion. Your presentation should be delivered as if you were having a casual conversation with a friend. “per our last discussion “ is legalize and does not fit into a sound plan.

Self paced training requires discipline and determination. Once you are able to set a goal or target for yourself, you will need to follow it diligently and track your progress and new learnings.

One of the main challenges of self-paced training is there is a tendency for an individual to not fully read all the details resulting to misunderstanding of how a certain process work. It is still important that knowledge checks be conducted in intervals or at the end of the self-paced training.

In order to have these requirements and perform better, you need to have ambition towards long term goals. To maintain motivation and hard work is not easy, that's why setting up bigger and better plans is necessary.

I think one of the main challenges here is creating the time-schedule and maintaining the self-discipline to complete it. Especially when training around other commitments it can be easy to put it off and not give it the effort you ideally want to. Creating a literal schedule based around your free time, balanced of course with respite can help.

Adding on to Jake C The trainer should always be adaptable to the needs of the trainee's. If the trainer cannot adapt then their is a breakdown. Groupwork should be limited to formative activities and only individual outcomes should be assesed in terms of specific learning goals Intrinsic abilities such as group work ability, communicative abilities, organising, etc should be assessed under a broad set of circumstances that allow the learner to grow and adapt.

Its in my opion that instructor lead training is more benificial by means of informative teachings and fact based knowledge sharings from seasoned experts which is crucial for proper learning and development. with that being said I still enjoy the freedom of self training roles as it give's you the freedom to complete your tasks at your own pace and prepares you for solo work in the future.

Pressure and fear of failure are the two main challenges facing a learner here. It can work for some but not all. It's easy to not ask 'that question' and pass on through when you really should go ahead and ask it. A good tutor should recongnise these however and effectively balance pushing their students along side the right types of feedback and learning styles.

A good way to find the neccesary balance is to ask Is it answers I want or practice I want ? If you want answers, that means you are asking questions that require deep thinking and high level cognitive function, thus self pacing is better. If I want skills or knowledge, demonstrated, then instructor led is better. It is also important to note that training where safety requirements are paramount or stringent are better.

When individual exploration is combined with structured guidance and support from an enlightened mentor, nothing stands in the way.

I feel the balance comes from 3 core principles: Interest/commitment Work/life balance End goal In relation to interest there is no reason why you cannot sample on a self-paced then move on to instructor lead as you found you really want to push into that field. Further you could move back to self-paced as a refresher or to practice. Balance is important, choosing your training to suit work and home commitments will determine whether you can continue through or burn yourself out. Determining your end goal will help you create what mix of the two will help get you to achieve your own targets from it.

A suggestion is to identify how important is the training, what for and the value of human interaction. For example: - Self-paced: personal development/non-mandatory (learn new product), non-urgent knowledge, simple knowledge (how to connect your phone), knowledge necessitting time or needed review/practise (trailhead), consensual product/situation (how close a call) - Instructor-led: team development (upskill the team), urgent knowledge (security breach situation), dealing with unclear situation (learning new tools after an acquisition), sensitive product/difficult situation (dealing with porn or hate speech) And always leave a place for feedback.

From my experience, the content to be assimilated and the individuals assimilation rate plays a keen role in deciding what approach works best. Also, what hours are your peak rates for study? Providing answers to this question will enable one achieve the desired balance.

Balancing self-paced and instructor-led training involves offering a blend of both approaches. Allow learners to progress at their own pace through self-paced materials, while also incorporating scheduled instructor-led sessions for clarification, interactive discussions, and deeper understanding. This combination provides flexibility and personalized learning while ensuring guidance and engagement from instructors when needed.