How do you balance the rigour and relevance of peacebuilding evaluation methods and approaches?
Peacebuilding evaluation is a complex and challenging task that requires both rigour and relevance. Rigour means applying systematic, credible, and ethical methods and standards to assess the effectiveness, efficiency, and impact of peacebuilding interventions. Relevance means ensuring that the evaluation questions, criteria, and findings are meaningful, useful, and responsive to the needs and expectations of the stakeholders, especially the beneficiaries and the donors. How do you balance these two dimensions in your peacebuilding evaluation practice? Here are some tips and insights to help you navigate this dilemma.
-
Machane Daniel I.Contributing to Advancing the Humanitarian-Development-Environment Nexus through the United Nations System | PhD…
-
Maya Alexis MeleCandidate for BA in International Affairs and Political Science | UN Geneva Research Fellow | First Committee Aide at…
-
Peter J HughesIntegrated Peace Strategist, Designer, Inventor, Policy advisor. .