How do you balance manual and automated testing?

In my experience as Director of DevOps and Quality Engineering, I have seen agile testing teams use a mix of manual and automated testing. We deployed code to the QA environment multiple times a day, testing testable delta functionalities to catch bugs early. We used manual testing enablers such as test data simulators, log watchers, and screen captures to improve efficiency. We also used AI-powered tools like Applitools for visual regression testing. This helped us to identify and fix bugs quickly and efficiently, which ultimately led to high-quality software. The 80/20 rule can be applied to manual testing to minimize the amount of manual effort required. AI and LLM models can be used as a catalyst to make manual testing more efficient.

As per my experience, automation plays a very vital role in terms of effort reduction for manual testers when we create a process for test data creation, be it through front end mimicking the end user behaviour or backend. It buys more time to the testers to focus on functionality, do boundary value analysis and catch bugs early in the cycle.

Here are some considerations and best practices to achieve an effective balance: 1. Identify Test Scenarios Suitable for Automation 2. Use Manual Testing for Exploratory and Ad-Hoc Testing. 3. Leverage manual testing for exploratory testing, usability testing, and scenarios where human intuition and creativity are essential. 4. Prioritize Test Cases for Automation. High-maintenance test scripts may not be suitable for scenarios that change frequently. Keep automated scripts modular and reusable to minimize maintenance efforts. 5. Adapt to Continuous Integration/Continuous Deployment (CI/CD). Integrate automated tests into CI/CD pipelines to ensure rapid feedback on code changes.

Achieving the right equilibrium between manual and automation testing is essential for effective Quality Assurance (QA) in software development. Consider project requirements, identify suitable scenarios for automation, prioritize critical test cases, and evaluate the Return on Investment (ROI) for automation efforts. Utilize automation for repetitive tasks, particularly regression testing, and leverage manual testing for exploratory, usability, and Agile-centric scenarios. Continuous collaboration and regular strategy reviews ensure adaptability to project dynamics. By finding this balance, teams enhance efficiency, maximize test coverage, and deliver high-quality software.

As per my experience manual testing is where the magic of human intuition shines. It's perfect for catching those unexpected issues that automated tests might overlook. For example, when you're exploring a new user interface, nothing beats manually testing it to uncover any usability quirks

Choosing the right testing tool is crucial for your enterprise, especially considering the type of technology you're using. If your enterprise has siloed technologies, selecting a tool becomes easier. For instance, if you're an e-commerce site, you can choose from several low-code, AI-based automation tools that anyone can use. However, if you're a TCoE that supports legacy ERP systems, you'll need expensive tools. When deciding what to automate, it's not just about the 80/20 principle; it depends on how frequently you build and deploy and how long your tests take to run. Therefore, it's essential to strike a balance between high-value functions and test coverage.

Automated testing is a lifesaver for repetitive tasks and regression tests. Imagine running the same login test across multiple browsers ,automation ensures it's done consistently and quickly, freeing up your time for more complex testing

Finding the equilibrium between manual and automated testing hinges on a well-executed ROI analysis and efficient benefit tracking. Before investing in automation, it's crucial to conduct a thorough ROI analysis. This involves defining your automation goals and assessing the effort and costs required to achieve them. If the returns don't seem promising, it might be wise to reconsider the automation strategy. However, it's important to note that ROI analysis should extend beyond mere cost savings and resource reduction. Quality improvements, faster time-to-market, and others. Once a viable ROI is established, the next step is to consider how to effectively track and report the benefits of automation to all stakeholders.

ChatGPT Balancing manual and automated testing offers numerous benefits. Manual testing excels in exploratory and usability aspects, ensuring a human touch. Automation enhances efficiency for repetitive tasks, accelerates regression testing, and supports continuous integration. The combination provides comprehensive test coverage, reduces time-to-market, and allows teams to adapt to changing project needs. Collaborative efforts enhance overall testing effectiveness, ensuring a robust and efficient software testing process.

To combine both manual and automated testing give us a dynamic approach tailored to the unique needs of each project. The team can maximize efficiency, identify critical issues, and deliver high-quality software while adapting to evolving testing requirements throughout the development lifecycle.

When you balance both approaches, you get the best of both worlds. Automated tests handle the routine stuff, allowing your manual testers to dive deep into complex scenarios. This way, you’re not just ticking boxes—you’re improving the overall quality of the product.

Balancing manual and automated testing presents challenges such as initial automation setup time, maintenance overhead, and difficulty in automating certain test scenarios. Ensuring appropriate test coverage, managing dynamic project requirements, and aligning with evolving technologies require continuous effort. Collaboration between manual and automation testers and strategic adaptation to project needs are crucial for overcoming these challenges.

Balancing manual and automated testing presents challenges such as initial automation setup time, maintenance overhead, and difficulty in automating certain test scenarios. Ensuring appropriate test coverage, managing dynamic project requirements, and aligning with evolving technologies require continuous effort.

Good management of manual & automated testing is like conducting an orchestra - different tools, playing different tunes, at times at different rhythms. It requires precise planning and conducting. To maximize the benefits of balancing manual and automated testing, plan and design your testing strategy, while choosing tools and frameworks that are compatible, scalable, and easy to use. Document and organize your test cases and scripts well. Follow the best practices and standards of testing. Use test automation frameworks or tools that support test data and environment management and implementing test automation best practices. Monitor and analyze the test results, and review and refine your testing strategy and process regularly

Remember, your testing needs will evolve as your product grows. Regularly reassess how you're balancing manual and automated testing, and stay open to new tools and strategies to keep everything running smoothly.