How can you train developers to avoid OWASP vulnerabilities?

Training developers to prevent OWASP vulnerabilities in my opinion necessary for laying a solid foundation for new security engineers and developers. Starting with educating them on common OWASP issues or better said, the OWASP Top 10, integrating security into the development lifecycle, and emphasizing secure coding practices. Automated tools like Dependency-Check and ZAP must be used to scan for latest vulnerabilities. Regular updates and collaboration with security teams help developers stay informed. By sharing real-world examples, the strategy empowers developers to mitigate OWASP vulnerabilities, ensuring the creation of robust and secure web applications. Educating them for secure coding practices as per OWASP must be included.

Encourage code reviews with a focus on security, integrate automated tools for vulnerability scanning, and foster a security-conscious culture within the development team.

As told in the book "The art of war" by Sun Tsu, "“If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles.” first we know who we are, what we have, what we should protect, find out how it can be stolen and how it can be protected. This assessment should be done truthfully. Then the gap of what is needed to what is present should be assessed. Once again, success of this exercise always depends on honest self assessment.

Existem diversas formas de educar, no quesito desenvolvedores: Treinamento em seguran?a: é importante que os desenvolvedores recebam treinamento em seguran?a, a fim de entender os princípios básicos de seguran?a da informa??o e as melhores práticas de desenvolvimento seguras. Eles devem ser capazes de reconhecer amea?as comuns e entender como mitigá-las. Nesse ponto entra um time essencial dentro da equipe de Seguran?a, o Orage Team que dentre todas as responsabilidades tem a miss?o de educar e treinar os desenvolvedores e criar os SecurityChampions. O Top10 OWASP de 2017 para cá n?o muda tanto, ou seja, n?o é t?o complicado assim resolver os problemas no inicio certo ? Security by Design sempre !

I’ve found OWASP testing guides as an important asset, how ever I would not depend only on online tools for code review, in my experience this is a great tool for first pass but having coding best practices and code review would be important as well

Developers must integrate secure coding practices into their workflow. This involves adhering to coding standards and guidelines, like those outlined by the OWASP Secure Coding Practices. Leverage advanced security-focused frameworks and libraries that offer built-in protection mechanisms. Also, utilize a static and dynamic code analyzers, and formatters to evaluate code for potential security flaws and enforce quality standards. Further, embrace and implement secure development life cycle methodologies such as Agile, DevOps, and DevSecOps, which integrate security considerations and testing continuously throughout the software development process. By adopting these practices, developers can significantly enhance their defenses.

Organizations should be ruthlessly truthful in following the secure coding standards without any deviations. Several software are developed with a lenience here and are bound to fail!

Use AI-powered SAST tools like Qwiet AI that predict and prevent code vulnerabilities and defects before deployment. Besides using tools, integrate manual security like penetration testing into the process. Peer code reviews also help identify potential vulnerabilities and promote knowledge sharing about secure coding practices. Build a habit of maintaining an incident response plan with procedures to tackle security breaches or vulnerabilities in your applications.

Ensure to include Security testing n development life cycke and for each and every release. Plan closure of all findings, even low severity, because we never know which will be escalated to higher severity in production environment.

Leveraging frameworks and libraries with integrated security features while aligning with the OWASP Secure Coding Practices is paramount. Additionally, the use of code analyzers, linters, and formatters can effectively ensure and enforce code quality and security. It's also advisable to consider incorporating secure development methodologies such as agile, devops, and devsecops, as these approaches seamlessly integrate security into every phase of the software development lifecycle.

Regular reviews and testing play a pivotal role in avoiding OWASP vulnerabilities. Conducting routine code reviews, emphasizing OWASP guidelines, to catch potential issues early in the development process. Implementing automated testing tools and processes to systematically identify and address security vulnerabilities. Encouraging a robust testing culture that includes both static and dynamic assessments, ensuring comprehensive coverage. By integrating regular reviews and testing into your development lifecycle, you enhance your ability to proactively mitigate OWASP vulnerabilities and maintain a more secure application environment.

Les tests de sécurité peuvent être réalisés à trois étapes : - durant le développement, avec des outils de type SAST qui analysent en continu le code produit à la recherche de vulnérabilités ; - durant les mises à jour du projet, avec des outils de type Scanners de vulnérabilités, qui réalisent des tests offensifs capables de détecter des problèmes potentiels dans le projet ; - durant les mises à jour majeures du projet, via des tests d'intrusion réalisés par des experts externes.

Organize simulated attacks or penetration testing exercises to allow developers to experience how attackers might exploit vulnerabilities in the application. This hands-on approach can enhance their understanding of potential risks.

Just like regularly assessing developers' knowledge and skills, assessing the gaps in application is equally essential for avoiding the cyber-attacks exploiting vulnerabilities. Performing regular vulnerability assessments and penetration testing plays an important role in web application security, as it can present a mechanism to quantify the level of security exposure in app environment. In my opinion, the security testing yields better results when the applications are assessed against specific application security criteria such as those defined by OWASP. Testing can either be tool based (QualysGuard, TenableNessus, Acunetix, etc.) or manual with a web browser or designated client software.

Es fundamental el realizar ejercicios organizados, en que los sistemas y las aplicaciones sean probados. Por un lado, ante la realización de pentest, ejercicios de red team, etc., podrá verse el funcionamiento de los equipos de trabajo, respuesta de incidentes, soc, etc., y por el otro podrá comprobarse la verdadera fortaleza de las medidas de seguridad, tanto de los entornos, como de los desarrollos. De esta manera, los desarrolladores podrán experimenten cómo los atacantes pueden potencialmente aprovechar las vulnerabilidades de la aplicación, las malas configuraciones, etc.

Most of the time application has thrid libary or software dependency best way is to deal with is to use latest version or upgraded to stable version and if due to dependency we can’t update the so we have to continues monitor on that libary.

La mise à disposition d'un SBOM (Software Bill of Materials) de l'application permet d'intégrer les données des dépendances utilisées dans un logiciel de suivi des dépendances et/ou de le fournir aux clients. Cela permet de savoir exactement quelles bibliothèques sont utilisées sans devoir passer des jours à les référencer et ainsi d'être réactif à la sortie de vulnérabilités critiques comme Log4shell.

La mise à jour des dépendances applicatives permet de neutraliser les vulnérabilités documentées dans les bases publiques, nommées CVE. Ces vulnérabilités sont notamment référencées dans les bases du NVD et de GitHub Security Advisory. Une veille est très simple à faire sur ces éléments, et peut être réalisée gratuitement à l'aide d'outils comme Dependabot. Ces vulnérabilités peuvent être priorisées à l'aide des scores CVSS et EPSS, à la main ou avec des outils commerciaux. L'installation des mises à jour de sécurité pour les dépendances concernées doit être réalisée régulièrement, en faisant attention à ne pas provoquer de casse dans le projet. Pour ce dernier point, le mieux est de mettre en place des tests de non régression.

Several commercial off the shelf (COTS) solutions exist for managing dependencies. Renovate is one popular solution that can integrate pretty well with most CI/CD solutions. Ideally development teams should be responsible for introducing new dependencies. These teams should watch the development of their dependencies by observing the 3p project's life (is it not being updated anymore), how well they respond to security reports (if at all), how many reverse or 2nd order dependencies they contain, and of course their security history (looking at you mermaid.js, and imagemagick!). Dependencies should be audited before being added to a codebase.

An example of this is the flaw we saw in case of log4j, one follows coding guidelines, regular testing in their sdlc,but dependency on open source components and third party libraries is quite common .hence it becomes mandatory to update the patches, dependency checker tools or even maintaining a Software Bill of Materials, following CVSS scoring for environment and keeping one's software updated.

In my experience educating developer plays key role in secure development. We can implement below techniques to achieve this - Start a knowledgable sharing sessions (Brownbags , lunch and learn etc.) - Start a weekly developer centric security news letter with real life vulnerability/exploit examples - Plan for gamified learning approach which always works. Host a security bug bashing event, gamified event to find and fix security bug etc. - Educate, Train and evaluate their knowledge and Build a mechanism to provide timely feedback and recognise and reward them

O time de SI pode incentivar, orientar e apoiar os desenvolvedores a codificarem com seguran?a e integrar à todo ciclo seguro. Usando plataformas web gratuita que ajuda o DEV a codificar de forma segura, o DEV pratica diariamente nova maneira de codificar. Para ajudar, é possível utilizar ferramentas que integrem em suas IDEs, o DEV vê na prática as vulnerabilidades em seus códigos. Outras ferramentas e políticas poder?o ser acrescentadas ao longo do ciclo. Opcionalmente, podem implantar ferramentas pagas, mas depende do business de cada empresa. Para que o treinamento aos DEVs seja efetivo, é preciso planejamento, engajamento e comprometimento junto à equipe de desenvolvimento, sem isso, o processo poderá custar caro lá na frente.

Educating and training is the key for a secure successful sdlc program.Unless developers don't understand the big picture of how vulnerabilities can be exploited and the impact of the vulnerabilities and the fix ,he /she will not understand what mitigation steps to put in place. Training can be e learning, podcast, hackathon,quiz etc

Employee training does indeed play an important role in IT security standards. As one might say, behind the machine there is a human being who is vulnerable. Although companies are investing more budget in security tools and approaches to strengthen security policy. Human resources must be taken into consideration when implementing corrective measures. Faced with the evolution of the social engineer currently it is obligatory to have a culture of IT security in the life of the human being and not only in the company. Use of bank cards. Password strategy etc. Training remains among the effective methods in the face of this evolution

La capacitación continua es la clave para reforzar el conocimiento y ampliar el espectro del personal sobre la concientización en seguridad y crear cultura de riesgos.

The sixth and final step in preventing OWASP vulnerabilities is to learn from mistakes and continuously enhance web application security. Utilize incident response plans, root cause analysis, and lessons learned to effectively address and resolve security incidents and breaches. Employ metrics, reports, and dashboards to measure and monitor web application security performance and progress. Additionally, leverage surveys, interviews, and forums to gather and share security experiences and insights with your team and the broader community. This approach not only rectifies current issues but also fosters an environment of ongoing learning and improvement in security practices.

Mistakes happen, but in security, learning from them is key. Embrace incident response plans and root cause analysis to dissect breaches, not just patch them. Track progress with metrics and dashboards, and share insights through surveys and forums. Empower your team, build resilience, and watch your security posture evolve beyond just preventing vulnerabilities.

As Zero Days will be launched daily and identified you can just use automation to mitigate OWASP vulnerabilities. In addition to that you have to prepare with meshed architectures and automation based solutions to prevent for the future against these threats.

One of the examples that I can quote from my experience here, when the ASR team learnt from their mistake, was coming up with an exception process, that came out to be one of the key steps in overall vulnerability management program. As per the step 4 here in avoiding OWASP vulnerabilities, patching is one of the important aspects after identifying the loopholes, but most of the time patching the system is not convenient at that particular time, in this case the exception process has helped the team to keep a track on missing patches so that they can revisit those once it is doable, whereas forgetting about those missing patches forever.

Enhance web application security by learning from mistakes and continuously improving. Utilize incident response plans, root cause analysis, and lessons learned to effectively handle security incidents and breaches. Employ metrics, reports, and dashboards to measure and monitor web application security performance. Gather and share experiences and insights through surveys, interviews, and forums with your team and the community. This iterative learning and improvement process establishes a resilient web application security framework, reducing the risk of OWASP vulnerabilities over time.

Most familiar interface for the developer is their IDE. If security insights and context could be delivered to the IDE itself , then they can understand and fix those errors then and there. Furthermore this will integrate secure coding to the early stages of the development process which would reduce the errors.

Follow the layered approach for security. Implement the security not only in development pipeline but also in operational environment e.g dependency scanning should also be present in Kubernetes environments along with CICD pipeline to ensure if one control is bypassed then other is present to identify the vulnerabilities

In addition to addressing OWASP vulnerabilities and embedding security in the SDLC, it is vital to consider a holistic cybersecurity approach. This includes implementing threat modeling techniques, conducting regular code reviews, and static analysis

Maintaining ongoing collaboration between AappSec and developers is key for enhancing the security of application development. This involves cultivating a shared understanding of common objectives, addressing DevOps challenges, and providing security insights. Furthermore, tools must be available for early detection of vulnerabilities during the development phase. This includes implementing IDE scans and pipeline scans with fine-tuned policies. Additionally, governance should be established regarding the selection of libraries and auxiliaries, as these can introduce vulnerabilities that may be difficult to remediate if the selected libraries are unsupported.

Honestly, by not leaving it up to the developers. It's time for organizations to embrace the inevitable, dynamic code scanning. When a developer uploads code to code repository, that code should be scanned for potential OWASP vulnerabilities and the developer should be notified. In 5 years, this will be built in to all of the major code repositories, right now, it's comes with a premium cost that business should just pay.