How can you solve scheduling problems in job shop, flow shop, and assembly line production?

1 Job shop scheduling

Job shop production is characterized by low-volume, high-variety, and customized products that require different machines and operations in a flexible order. Job shop scheduling is one of the most complex and challenging problems in production planning. To solve this problem, you can use heuristic rules, mathematical models, or simulation models. Heuristic rules are simple and easy-to-apply rules that assign priorities to jobs based on certain criteria. Mathematical models are formal and rigorous methods that use mathematical equations and variables to represent the scheduling problem and its constraints and objectives. Simulation models are dynamic and realistic methods that use computer software to mimic the behavior and interactions of the production system. Heuristic rules can provide good solutions in a short time, but they may not guarantee the optimal solution or consider all the constraints and objectives. Mathematical models can provide optimal or near-optimal solutions, but they may require a lot of computational time and resources. Simulation models can provide insights into the performance and outcomes of different scheduling scenarios, but they may not provide a specific solution or a clear evaluation criterion.

2 Flow shop scheduling

Flow shop production is characterized by high-volume, low-variety, and standardized products that follow the same sequence of machines and operations in a fixed order. Flow shop scheduling is less complex than job shop scheduling, but it still requires finding the optimal sequence of jobs to minimize the total completion time, the maximum flow time, the average flow time, the idle time, and other criteria. To help solve these problems, you can use Johnson's rule for two machines, branch and bound for more than two machines, and genetic algorithms which are adaptive and stochastic methods that use natural evolution to search for optimal or near-optimal solutions. Johnson's rule involves sorting jobs by their processing times on each machine and arranging them in a sequence to minimize the total completion time. Branch and bound involves dividing the problem into smaller subproblems and eliminating those that cannot lead to a better solution than the current best solution using lower and upper bounds. Genetic algorithms involve creating and modifying a population of candidate solutions using selection, crossover, and mutation operators before evaluating them using a fitness function.

3 Assembly line scheduling

Assembly line production is characterized by high-volume, low-variety, and standardized products that are assembled from components or subassemblies on a conveyor belt that moves at a constant speed. To optimize the allocation of tasks to workstations, minimizing the number of workstations, idle time, balance delay, and other criteria, there are several methods and tools that can be employed. Line balancing is a technique that attempts to evenly distribute tasks among the workstations so that each has the same or similar amount of work to do. This can be achieved through heuristic rules such as longest task time, shortest task time, and ranked positional weight, or through mathematical models like linear programming and integer programming. Line scheduling is another technique that seeks to determine optimal start and finish times of each workstation based on material availability, worker availability, machine availability, and customer demand. This can be done using mathematical models like mixed-integer programming and network models or simulation models such as discrete-event simulation and agent-based simulation. Lastly, line control is a technique used to monitor and adjust the performance and efficiency of the assembly line in the face of uncertainties like breakdowns, defects, and variations. This can be done using feedback mechanisms like sensors, alarms, indicators or adaptive mechanisms such as artificial neural networks, fuzzy logic, and expert systems.

4 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?