How can you resolve conflicts between researchers and IRBs?
Conflicts between researchers and institutional review boards (IRBs) are not uncommon, especially when it comes to complex or sensitive research projects. IRBs are responsible for ensuring that research involving human subjects is ethical, legal, and respectful of the participants' rights and welfare. Researchers, on the other hand, may have different perspectives, goals, and methods that may clash with the IRBs' standards and expectations. How can you resolve these conflicts and foster a collaborative and constructive relationship between researchers and IRBs? Here are some tips to help you navigate this challenging situation.