How can you estimate rock mechanical properties from formation evaluation data?

1 Static methods

Static methods use empirical or analytical correlations between rock mechanical properties and formation evaluation data that are measured under static or low-frequency conditions. For example, you can use well logs, such as bulk density, sonic, and resistivity, to estimate Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio based on empirical equations derived from laboratory data. You can also use core analysis data, such as porosity, permeability, and mineralogy, to estimate unconfined compressive strength based on rock physics models. Static methods are simple and convenient, but they may have limited accuracy and applicability due to the variability and heterogeneity of rock formations.

2 Dynamic methods

Dynamic methods use formation evaluation data that are measured under dynamic or high-frequency conditions, such as seismic data and acoustic logging. These data reflect the elastic wave propagation and attenuation in the rock medium, which are related to the rock mechanical properties. For example, you can use seismic velocities and attenuation to estimate Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio based on elastic wave theory. You can also use acoustic logging data, such as Stoneley wave slowness and amplitude, to estimate unconfined compressive strength based on fluid flow and fracture models. Dynamic methods are more sensitive and robust, but they may require more complex processing and interpretation.

3 Hybrid methods

Hybrid methods combine static and dynamic methods to improve the estimation of rock mechanical properties from formation evaluation data. For example, you can use a calibration procedure to adjust the static methods with the dynamic methods, or you can use a multivariate regression or machine learning approach to integrate multiple data sources and reduce the uncertainty. Hybrid methods can enhance the reliability and accuracy of the estimation, but they may also increase the computational and data requirements.

4 Challenges and solutions

Estimating rock mechanical properties from formation evaluation data is not a trivial task. It faces several challenges, such as data quality and availability, spatial resolution and coverage, rock heterogeneity and anisotropy, stress and temperature effects, and uncertainty quantification. To overcome these challenges, you need to apply appropriate methods and techniques, such as data cleaning and filtering, data integration and fusion, rock classification and segmentation, stress and temperature correction, and uncertainty analysis and propagation. You also need to validate and compare the results with direct measurements or field observations.

5 Benefits and applications

Estimating rock mechanical properties from formation evaluation data has many benefits and applications for drilling engineering. It can help you to reduce the cost and time of obtaining the data, to increase the spatial coverage and resolution of the data, to enhance the understanding and characterization of the rock formations, and to support the decision making and optimization of the drilling operations. Some of the applications include wellbore stability analysis, hydraulic fracturing design, sand production prediction, and geomechanical modeling and simulation.

6 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?