How can you ensure public transit systems remain adaptable to new technologies?

First of all, be open to new technologies and see what's coming on the horizon. Partnering with technology vendors are important and most effective. A testbed is always helpful. Be clear what problems that a technological solution is going to solve and what benefits your end-customers and other stakeholders would enjoy. What return of investment could the project reap. Last, with proper justification and small scale testing, a smooth execution is critical for new technological solution adaptation, as any unexpected disruptions to an operating public transit systems will deter future projects. Risks and scenario planning is important prior to system deployment. A simple "what-why-how" approach.

Effective integration of new technology in public transit isn't just about current assessments; it's about proactive, data-driven strategy. Take Singapore's implementation of real-time tracking, which revolutionized passenger experience and efficiency. Similarly, New York City's use of big data for optimizing bus routes resulted in a 10% service reliability increase. These cases show that understanding current needs and leveraging data can lead to impactful innovations. Such strategic approaches ensure investments not only address present gaps but also propel systems towards future-ready, user-centric services.

Every invest in public transit is suspect to user acceptance. So market reseacrh, user acceptance test and evaluation of expectations need to be the basis of decisions. In addition, the situation in different cities and regions will differ significantly. Paris, London, Shanghai, Mumbai, Cairo, Oslo, Berlin, Bogota, Tokyo, etc - they all can learn from each other and adopt best practices. Their structure, movement patterns, cultural aspects, investment abilities and technical feasibilities will be decisive what will bring a real value. The combination of local requirements with the user expectation will bring success to the projects.

Regardless of your existing infrastructure within the public transportation sector, GO ELECTRIC from the very start. The future is electric! Don't miss this one by putting in some fossil fuel legacy thing! GO ELECTRIC!!

We should embrace technological agnosticism. This means prioritizing operational goals and user experiences over specific technologies, ensuring transit systems remain adaptable as innovations evolve. Additionally, envisioning transit as an integrated mobility ecosystem is crucial. Here, different technologies don't just coexist, they interact and complement each other, enhancing overall system efficiency and user satisfaction. By combining this ecosystem approach with incremental innovations and a focus on transit equity, we can create a public transit system that is both technologically advanced and deeply attuned to the needs of all its users.

Future transit models will only work in integratedsolutions. Individual concepts have come to their limits, be it individual passenger cars or public transport systems. The integration of the individual means of transport is a necessity. This means that technology must be open for all indivual interfaces, data exchanges and processes. Standardisation and openess should be the basis for any decision to build the transit ecosystems.

I propose a dual approach for stakeholder engagement in adopting new transit technologies. Firstly, a digital engagement platform will be instrumental in maintaining continuous dialogue and gathering diverse inputs. This platform facilitates transparency and broadens our reach, allowing stakeholders to share feedback and ideas conveniently. Simultaneously, we should implement urban prototypes, placing emerging technologies in real urban settings. These physical prototypes enable stakeholders to experience and interact with new technologies within their daily urban context. This hands-on experience is invaluable in understanding the practical impact of these technologies on city life and urban fabric.

Every change will lead to some kind of resistance. This can be from any kind of stakeholders, be it the employees, the management, deciders, or - most important - the users. In western Europe we have experienced a strong "not in my backyard" attitude when it comes to large scale changes, e.g. with infrastructure projects like new airports or train stations. But also changes in the tariff structure or the funding for certain groups can trigger negative responses. To avoid these pitfalls, technology needs to reach out the stakeholders and explain the benefits and the necessities of the change.

Every implementation needs the right partnering, suppliers, integrators, consultants, etc. Managing these ecosystems is critical for the results, especially to finish the projects according to time, cost and quality parameters. There are many examples of projects with exploding costs and timelines. Reasons are many, but unclear regulations, moving targets and bad project management are among the most common ones to spoil your success.