How can you ensure Agile QA adapts to changing requirements?

In a #lowcode implementation(#outsystems #outsystemsdevelopers #outsystemspartners), we need to stride with even more further caution. The reason is lowcode implementation is more than twice faster than a regular #highcode . In this scenario, not only qa but also business users team needs to be aligned. Here the was team should constantly keep updating their tests cases documents and BA should update use case documents too. While constant updating is important, equally important is governance in handling the changes. So constant track and vigil on requirements id an absolute must.

Let's take a real time scenario, A critical new change is added to sprint which needs to push in the same delivery .As an agile coach the complete team needs to understand the requirement correctly at the same time to imply agile principles effectively.So that constant quality is maintained and QA will also give feedback quickly which lead to improved product development process

Pathways to success: - QA must participate in refinement process to refine the acceptance criteria - checkin process must include execution of unit tests - promotion to UAT and higher environments must include execution of automated end to end tests that include the new functionality - promotion to publicly available networks must ensure that static, dynamic and software composition analysis security tests have been run and have no high or critical vulnerabilities identified

In #lowcode and #outsystems implementations we have #AIMENTORSTUDIO module which acts as a mentor and watchdog. #AIMENTORSTUDIO has five mentors, namely Code Mentor, Architecture Mentor, Security Mentor, Performance Mentor, and Maintainability Mentor. Thus, you will realize , #outsystems "Fosters a culture of quality" within the product and along with process this only increases the quality quotient. #outsystemsdevelopers #outsystemspartners

In Agile development, quality is a shared responsibility. As new requirements arise, and old ones evolve, product management has to define acceptance criteria that will guide developers and QA. This would eliminate ambiguity and help test automation; Gherkin can be used to implement the practice Developers also own their part of the quality and use acceptance criteria as input. First, thorough unit testing, possibly guided by TDD practices, and ongoing code reviews are necessary. Second, check-in discipline, where code only gets promoted with integration testing, is required; continuous integration is well-understood by now and should be implemented. Thus, to be successful, QA should look at the quality of the end-to-end development process