How can you determine the appropriate resolution for a laser scanning project?

To determine the resolution in a laser scan, factors such as the level of detail desired, the size of the area to be scanned, the capabilities of the scanning equipment, as well as the speed of the scan are effective. For larger areas, a lower resolution may be sufficient, while smaller areas or objects may be Need higher resolution to capture fine details. Also, in these structures, higher resolution usually results in more accurate scans, but may require longer scan times.

The purpose of scanning should be always explained by the client. Service provider should be experienced enough to narrow these requirements and to suggest the right resolution.

As service provider be ready with various laser tool and as per requirement goal will be set. Resolution and precision with uncertainty goes hand on hand

A quick sketch of the scanning site can help save time and determine the optimal scanning locations. It will also help identify additional physical limitations that might impact a scanning project, such as obstructions, power needs, and additional equipment needs. If the project site is an existing outdoor structure, printing a Google Earth or other satellite image is a great way to organize a scanning strategy.

To determine the appropriate resolution for a laser scanning project: Assess project goals and detail requirements. Evaluate the size and complexity of target features. Consider accuracy needs and scanning equipment capabilities. Balance resolution with processing resources, time, and cost. Account for environmental conditions affecting data quality. By considering these factors, you can optimize resolution to meet project objectives efficiently.

Scanning a laser distance varies for different kinds. But then scanning a laser distance for resolution is more efficient when the person carrying out the process can interpret the result displayed on the screen after proper scanning has been done

This is not very precise explanation. It would be correct, if there was only one scanning position. However usual scanning workflow requires overlapping of the captured area. So the final pointcloud is with higher density than single station resolution

stitching of scans can be done from shorter distance with programmable system. So being as close for high resolutions and even compact. But yes if not high quality scanning surely can be taken from far away

In real life applications, scanning distance is probably the least important parameter. The resolution that you want and the parameters of your scanner will dictate the distance, not the other way around.

The easiest check workflow would be to look around. Generally speaking, what you see is what you get. And vice versa. What you don't see, the scanner does not see either. The only exception is the darkness. Laser scanning works regardless the amount of natural light

Your scanning environment is the physical and atmospheric conditions in which you are scanning. It affects the resolution of your data, because it can interfere with the laser beam and reduce its quality and intensity. For example, if you scan in a dusty or foggy environment, you may get lower resolution, because some of the laser light may be scattered or absorbed by the particles in the air. Similarly, if you scan in a bright or reflective environment, you may get lower resolution, because some of the laser light may be reflected or refracted by the surfaces in the scene. Therefore, you should consider your scanning environment before choosing your resolution

It is never a good workflow to rely on automatic processing and to be satisfied with less data captured. It is always better to have 20% more, than 1% (of crucial data) less

Depends on the amount of time to perform the scans and minimum accuracy requirements. I prefer to show up early and work through to get as many scans as possible.

A priori los números sobre plano siempre son correctos, ya que tenemos en cuenta distancia, potencia, perdidas. Con el plano en la mano, soy partidario de hacer la primera tirada hasta cliente final, ya que incluso las diversas curvas y transiciones posiblemente no planteadas todo variará, pasa algo parecido con las ICT de viviendas ó residencial los planos o estudios de proyectos dan unos DBs de perdida que luego suelen variar ( no mucho ) pero afecta a la hora de ajustar la potencia y regular esta con el ruido para que la se?al definitiva sea limpia. Un saludo