登录查看更多内容

How can you determine the accuracy of a clustering model?

由人工智能和领英社区提供技术支持

Clustering is a data mining technique that groups similar data points into clusters based on some criteria. It can help you discover patterns, segments, and outliers in your data. But how can you measure how well your clustering model performs? Unlike supervised learning, where you have labels to compare with, clustering is unsupervised and does not have a predefined outcome. Therefore, you need different methods to evaluate your clustering results. In this article, you will learn about some common ways to determine the accuracy of a clustering model.

在这篇协作文章中查找专家回答

由社区从 2 条内容中精选。了解更多

1 Internal Validation

One way to assess your clustering model is to use internal validation, which means using the data itself to measure the quality of the clusters. Internal validation methods usually rely on some criteria that capture the compactness and separation of the clusters, such as within-cluster sum of squares (WSS), between-cluster sum of squares (BSS), or silhouette coefficient. These criteria can help you compare different clustering models or choose the optimal number of clusters. However, they also have some limitations, such as being sensitive to the scale of the data, the shape of the clusters, or the choice of the distance metric.

添加您的观点

Aldo Gutierrez GAICD

Passionate about governance, strategic initiatives, and driving business growth through advanced data & AI solutions.
举报内容
Internal validation models are great to evaluate clustering performance without relying on external or pre-labelled data, they are highly suitable for scenarios insights are based on the intrinsic properties of the data. However, they are often based on assumptions about data structure that may not apply to all datasets. For example, the Silhouette Coefficient assumes a good cluster is one where each data point is closer to other points in the cluster than to points in different clusters. This can be effective in scenarios with well-separated, globular clusters, but less so with complex, overlapping clusters often found in real-world data.

已翻译

赞

2 External Validation

Another way to evaluate your clustering model is to use external validation, which means using some external information that is not part of the data to measure the agreement between the clusters and the true labels. External validation methods usually rely on some metrics that compare the cluster assignments with the true labels, such as purity, entropy, Rand index, or adjusted mutual information. These metrics can help you measure how well your clustering model matches the ground truth or the domain knowledge. However, they also have some drawbacks, such as requiring labels that may not be available or relevant, or being biased by the number or size of the clusters.

添加您的观点

Aldo Gutierrez GAICD

Passionate about governance, strategic initiatives, and driving business growth through advanced data & AI solutions.
举报内容
To give an example in my experience, let's think about customer segmentation. External validation can compare the model's grouping of customers with their known preferences or behaviours. However, a significant limitation is its dependence on the availability of labeled data, which may not always be accessible or may be costly to obtain. Furthermore, external validation can be biased towards the characteristics of the ground truth data, possibly overlooking novel or unexpected patterns identified by the model. This method also assumes that the ground truth is completely accurate, which might not always be the case, leading to potentially misleading assessments of the model's performance.

已翻译

赞

3 Stability Analysis

A third way to assess your clustering model is to use stability analysis, which means using multiple samples or perturbations of the data to measure the consistency of the clusters. Stability analysis methods usually rely on some measures that quantify the similarity or dissimilarity between different clusterings, such as Jaccard index, variation of information, or cluster stability. These measures can help you test how robust your clustering model is to noise, outliers, or changes in the data. However, they also have some challenges, such as being computationally expensive, requiring a sampling or perturbation strategy, or depending on the clustering algorithm.

添加您的观点

4 Visual Inspection

A final way to evaluate your clustering model is to use visual inspection, which means using graphical tools or plots to inspect the clusters and their characteristics. Visual inspection methods usually rely on some techniques that display the data or the clusters in a reduced dimension, such as scatter plots, dendrograms, heatmaps, or parallel coordinates. These techniques can help you explore the data, identify clusters, and detect anomalies. However, they also have some limitations, such as being subjective, losing information, or being affected by the visualization method.

添加您的观点

5 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

添加您的观点

Data Mining

+ 关注

给文章评分

我们借助人工智能创建了此文章。您认为这篇文章怎么样？

很棒不太好

举报此文章

查看全部

How can you determine the accuracy of a clustering model?

1

2

3

4

5

1 Internal Validation

2 External Validation

3 Stability Analysis

4 Visual Inspection

5 Here’s what else to consider

Data Mining

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

更多Data Mining相关文章

更多相关阅读内容

How can you determine the accuracy of a clustering model?

1

2

3

4

5

1 Internal Validation

2 External Validation

3 Stability Analysis

4 Visual Inspection

5 Here’s what else to consider

Data Mining

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

查看其他技能