There are different methods of evaluating team performance, such as peer reviews, self-reviews, manager reviews, or 360-degree feedback. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, depending on the context and culture of your team. For example, peer reviews can foster collaboration and trust among team members, but they can also be biased or influenced by personal relationships. Self-reviews can help employees reflect on their strengths and weaknesses, but they can also be inaccurate or unrealistic. Manager reviews can provide objective and consistent feedback, but they can also be perceived as top-down or authoritarian. 360-degree feedback can provide a comprehensive and balanced perspective, but it can also be time-consuming and overwhelming. You need to choose the evaluation method that best suits your team's size, structure, diversity, and dynamics.