How can you construct a sound argument without making assumptions?

Building assumptions to be utilized in decision making related to future goals has to be done in a methodological data supported and disciplined manner to avoid the pitfalls of bias, stereotypes, or logical fallacies. Realistic and ethical assumptions are used in building growth models based on data indicators or patterns.

Constructing a sound argument without making assumptions requires careful consideration of the evidence, logic, and framing of your claims. key steps to follow: Clearly Define Your Claim, gather Evidence, Use Deductive Reasoning , Consider Alternative Explanations,Avoid Ambiguous Language,Use Clear and Concise Structure,and Provide Context and Background Information.

To build a sound argument, gather evidence with care, and listen to opposing views with an open mind. Define terms with clarity, and avoid fallacies that can blind. Empirical evidence is your guide, and nuance is your friend. Consider multiple perspectives, and invite critique to refine your thought. With these steps, your argument will shine, strong and assumption-free, a beacon of truth and reason.

Any writing with the intention to inform, persuade and instruct should be devoid of assumptions. If such writing is replete with assumptions, its intention will fail. Assumption is an unverified statement that lacks concrete evidence or proof.

When I was doing research on cognitive biases I found several flat lists of items that can affect managerial decisions. It was only working as a manager myself that I realized how much impactful they can be. How many plans are based on groupthink and developed to please a customer at first, but are not feasible? How many budgets are biased for wishful thinking and result in underperformance and wrong financial decisions? Far too many. To me, a key for success in hindering those biases is strong professional ethics from managers in always telling the truth even when that poses a short-term obstacle to their career, making an investment in credibility and loyalty. It is important never to cross the line between bold ambition and plain bias.

Assumptions are dangerous in many ways. They kills the reliability of argument. They create room for doubts. A work full of assumptions can cannot be cited as a reference material.

In argumentation, unchecked assumptions are pitfalls. They can undermine your position, leading to conclusions built on shaky foundations. It's essential to critically evaluate each assumption, asking, "Is this substantiated?" or "Could there be another perspective?". Doing this not only strengthens your argument but also fosters a mindset open to diverse insights, crucial for robust and credible discussions. It’s vital to look at things from multiple angles. Don’t assume you know how others might view an issue; explore it from various perspectives. Critically question your assumptions, and wherever possible, turn them into facts through research and evidence.

Identifying assumptions involves questioning underlying beliefs. Look for implicit or unstated ideas in your thinking or others'. Pay attention to words like "always" or "never." Consider what must be true for your conclusions to hold.

The following are the indicators of assumptions: * to the best of my knowledge * as far as I know * in my opinion * people say that...

To evaluate assumptions, you can use a structured approach. Identify each assumption, assess its relevance, test its validity, and consider potential impacts. Verify assumptions through research or data analysis when possible.

In my experience, assumptions and expecially unrealistic assumptions are often make to resist change. To evaluata assumptions I like to adopt two tactics: - Recognize times where you or the person speaking is trying to deploy the tactics listed by Schopenhauer in his "The Art of Being Right". Are you diverting the issue? Are you generalizing a concept, or extending it to make it absurd? Knowing to recognize those cases is the way to avoid intentional or non-intentional manipulation - Generating alternatives to the proposed argument to then apply the Occam's Razor and challenge it by asking to yourself: is it really the simplest and most plausible cause?

I am not sure assumptions can be totally avoided, except for very simple topics. Herbert Simon's bounded rationality to me implies that for no human question all different variables can be known or controlled, or at least not in an economically sustainable way. The point should be more on how to limit them as much as possible, by: - citing your sources - citing limitations to your knowledge - explaining few scenarios by modifying the unknown assumption Other than this, it is also right to freely express your thoughts also if they are based on assumptions, by just making them explicit and avoiding manipulation

To construct a sound argument, you need to ensure that the premises are based on facts and evidence that can be verified. Ensure the premises are relevant to the conclusion and there are no hidden assumptions. One way to avoid making assumptions is to use deductive reasoning, which starts with general principles and moves to specific conclusions. In deductive reasoning, the conclusion is guaranteed to be true if the premises are true. Another way to avoid making assumptions is to use inductive reasoning. Inductive reasoning is a type of reasoning that starts with specific observations and moves to general conclusions. In inductive reasoning, the conclusion is not guaranteed to be true (likely to be) based on the evidence.

Constructing a sound argument without making assumptions requires careful attention to detail and a thorough understanding of the facts and evidence. By using deductive or inductive reasoning, you can construct a sound argument that is both valid and has all true premises.