How can you communicate the importance of addressing technical debt to project stakeholders?

2 Use Metaphors

Metaphors are powerful tools for explaining abstract concepts like technical debt. You can use familiar scenarios, such as house maintenance, to illustrate how neglecting small problems can lead to more significant issues down the line. Just as ignoring a leaky faucet can eventually lead to water damage and more costly repairs, ignoring technical debt can cause software systems to become fragile and prone to failure, which can be far more expensive to fix than addressing issues promptly.

3 Risk Highlighting

Highlighting the risks associated with technical debt is essential. You should articulate how accumulated debt can lead to system outages, security vulnerabilities , and reduced agility in responding to market changes or customer needs. Stakeholders must understand that while accruing some technical debt is often inevitable, it must be managed and reduced over time to prevent these risks from materializing and impacting the business.

4 Business Impact

Relate technical debt directly to business impact to make its importance clear. Discuss how technical debt can slow down the development of new features, affect the performance and user experience of the software, and ultimately lead to lost revenue or customers. Stakeholders are more likely to prioritize addressing technical debt if they can see how it directly affects the bottom line and the company's ability to compete in the market.

5 Plan Presentation

Present a clear plan for addressing technical debt. This should include an assessment of the current level of debt , a prioritized list of issues to tackle, and a proposed schedule for when and how to address them. By providing a structured approach, you help stakeholders understand that managing technical debt is a planned and controlled process, not a series of ad hoc fixes that disrupt regular development activities.

6 Ongoing Communication

Maintain ongoing communication about technical debt with stakeholders. Regular updates on what has been addressed, what is being worked on, and the benefits realized from reducing technical debt help keep it at the forefront of stakeholder minds. This also demonstrates the value of their investment in maintaining a clean codebase and ensures continued support for necessary refactoring work.

7 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?