Here's how you can navigate conflicts between sources with opposing viewpoints.

2 Verify Facts

With opposing viewpoints, facts are your anchors. They're the common ground upon which you can build a story that withstands scrutiny. Cross-reference information provided by your sources with established facts. This process often involves checking against multiple independent sources or databases. When facts are in dispute, present what each side claims alongside any objective evidence you've gathered. This not only bolsters your credibility but also allows readers to form their own informed opinions.

4 Diverse Voices

Seeking out a wide range of voices is crucial when dealing with conflicting sources. This doesn't just mean finding people who disagree; it's about representing the full spectrum of opinions and experiences related to your story. Sometimes, this may involve reaching out to marginalized or less-heard voices who can offer unique insights. The goal is to provide a platform for a multifaceted discussion, which in turn, enriches your reporting and helps prevent any single narrative from dominating.

6 Ethical Considerations

Finally, navigating conflicts between sources with care for ethical journalism is paramount. This includes respecting confidentiality agreements, avoiding sensationalism, and presenting information fairly. Be transparent with your audience about what you know and what you don't. Acknowledge the complexity of the issue and resist the temptation to oversimplify. Your integrity as a journalist is your most valuable asset; safeguarding it ensures trust with your audience and maintains the standard for your profession.

7 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?