Different priorities are a common situation, but the main thing is to prevent a dispute from turning into a confrontation. I believe that it helps to clarify the motivation of each side: why is this priority important? It often turns out that the goals overlap, just the view on them is different. It is also useful to show how the alignment of priorities affects the overall result. How do you deal with such situations?

Eu costumo seguir algumas etapas para ajudar a mitigar o conflito e promover uma comunica??o mais eficaz e colaborativa: -Facilito uma reuni?o onde ambas as partes possam expressar suas perspectivas e preocupa??es. -Garanto que cada um tenha a chance de ser ouvido sem interrup??es. -Ajudo a definir claramente os objetivos do projeto ou da tarefa em quest?o. -Enfatizo os interesses compartilhados entre o executivo e o membro da equipe. -Promovo uma discuss?o aberta sobre as prioridades. -Tento mediar um compromisso que atenda às preocupa??es de ambas as partes. -Registro os pontos discutidos e os acordos feitos, e envio uma ata para ambas as partes para garantir clareza e responsabilidade.

?????????????? ??????????????????????, ??????’?? ?????????? ???????? Executive teams thrive on diverse perspectives—that’s what fuels innovation and strong decision-making. But when those perspectives collide, the challenge isn’t just disagreement—it’s ensuring that conflict leads to progress, not paralysis. Great coaching doesn’t eliminate differences; it helps leaders navigate them with clarity, trust, and alignment. It shifts conversations from competing agendas to shared outcomes and from positional debates to collective problem-solving. The best leaders don’t seek agreement on everything—they seek commitment to the right things. That’s how real progress happens.

1.Understand Both Perspectives – Engage in active listening to identify the executive’s strategic priorities and the team member’s operational challenges. 2. Clarify Organizational Goals – Align their perspectives with the company’s overall objectives to find common ground. 3. Facilitate Open Dialogue – Create a neutral space where both parties can openly discuss their viewpoints without hierarchy overpowering the conversation. 4. Find a Compromise – Propose a solution that integrates both perspectives, ensuring both strategic direction and operational feasibility. 5. Establish Clear Action Steps – Define next steps that balance priorities, ensuring buy-in from both sides.

Alinhar prioridades com a estratégia, facilitar o diálogo, embasar decis?es com dados, estabelecer regras claras e garantir comunica??o objetiva.