I first seek specific examples by asking the reviewer to point out the exact lines or areas needing improvement. I clarify the feedback further by requesting actionable suggestions on what changes they expect. Lastly, I cross-reference the feedback with coding standards and best practices to understand the underlying issues. This process helps me turn unclear input into meaningful improvements.

1. Ask for Specifics: Politely request detailed feedback by asking targeted questions, such as, “Which part of the code could be improved, and how?” or “Does this logic align with the project requirements?” 2. Analyze Patterns: Review recurring comments or issues in the feedback. Identify areas like readability, performance, or structure that might need improvement based on context. 3. Propose Solutions: Suggest potential fixes or improvements when following up on feedback to demonstrate initiative, e.g., “Would refactoring this section into smaller functions address the concern?”

When I receive vague feedback on my code, I take a proactive approach to clarify and improve. First, I ask for specific examples or areas of concern to better understand the feedback. I engage in a constructive conversation to uncover the intent behind the comments and ensure alignment with the project’s goals and coding standards. If the feedback is related to readability or efficiency, I review my code for improvements and ask if there are particular aspects that need more attention. I see vague feedback as an opportunity to enhance communication, iterate on my work, and deliver better results moving forward.