You're struggling to write better. What are some logical reasoning techniques that can help you?

The Topic must be clear, and the basic knowledge must be researched and analysed properly to write in a structured way. Purpose must be clear of writing something like the audience, output, etc.

How do you make your logic easy to follow? You work backwards from the end point. This technique is useful for all kinds of problems - complex and simple. Remember, as a writer your power comes from helping people understand concepts. Your ability to let them see something new is what differentiates you. So it's worth spending time mapping the way to a point. When you work backwards, you reduce the chance of missing a step. And, you're more likely to meet your reader where they are. Then you can lead them back to your logical conclusion. Try it - you will start getting more complements from people who love your work!

Before you start writing, it’s important to understand what you’re trying to achieve. Are you trying to inform, persuade, or entertain? For example, if your purpose is to PERSUADE, your writing should be structured around convincing arguments and compelling evidence.

Deductive reasoning starts with a general statement and examines the possibilities to reach a specific, logical conclusion. For example, “All men are mortal. John is a man. Therefore, John is mortal.” Inductive reasoning, on the other hand, makes broad generalizations from specific observations. For example, “I’ve only ever seen white swans, therefore all swans must be white.”

Logical fallacies can undermine your arguments and make your writing less persuasive. For example, avoid ad hominem attacks (attacking the person instead of their argument), hasty generalizations (making assumptions based on insufficient evidence), and false dilemmas (presenting only two options when more exist).

L'utilisation du raisonnement analogique est une technique puissante pour renforcer mes écrits. Par exemple, dans le secteur municipal, lorsque j'explique les rouages complexes du monde municipal à travers des capsules municipales, cela permet aux citoyens de mieux comprendre ce qui sous-entend les décisions de l'administration et du conseil municipal. Ce qui décourage la désinformation, permet de mettre les choses en perspective et d'éviter les interprétations erronées. Quand je sens que ma rédaction perd en clarté ou s'éloigne de son objectif, je me recentre sur les faits pour clarifier et rendre l'information plus " digeste " pour les citoyens.

Ad Hominem Fallacy: This occurs when you attack the person making the argument rather than addressing the substance of the argument. Avoidance: Focus on addressing the ideas and arguments presented, not the person behind them. Strawman Fallacy: Creating a distorted or exaggerated version of your opponent's argument and attacking that instead of the actual argument. Avoidance: Represent your opponent's argument accurately and respond to the genuine points made. False Dichotomy (Either/Or Fallacy): Presenting a situation as having only two possible outcomes or options when, in reality, there are more. Avoidance: Acknowledge and explore a range of possibilities or options instead of oversimplifying.

Analogies and examples can make complex ideas more understandable and relatable for your readers. For example, explaining a complex scientific concept using a simple, everyday situation.

Always take the time to revise and edit your writing. Look for clarity, coherence, and conciseness. Check for grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors. For example, read your work aloud to catch awkward phrasing or run-on sentences.

Good writing is a skill that takes practice. Don’t be discouraged if it doesn’t come naturally at first. Keep writing, keep learning, and keep improving!