Handling conflicting feedback requires patience and a strategic approach. Start by actively listening to each stakeholder to understand their perspectives and goals. Look for commonalities in feedback, as they often reveal shared priorities for the project. Clarify any vague suggestions by asking specific questions to align on expectations. Present a balanced solution that incorporates the core elements of each viewpoint without compromising quality. Offer data or examples to support your recommendations, building credibility and showing rationale. Finally, communicate your proposed changes transparently, inviting further discussion if needed.

I approach conflicting feedback by actively listening to each stakeholder's perspective and seeking to understand their underlying concerns. Collaborating to find common ground allows me to create a balanced solution that aligns with our goals while ensuring everyone feels heard and valued.

To handle conflicting feedback from stakeholders on copy optimization: 1. **Gather All Feedback**: Collect feedback from each stakeholder to understand differing perspectives without bias. 2. **Identify Common Themes**: Look for recurring points or suggestions that can help unify the feedback. 3. **Prioritize Based on Goals**: Evaluate feedback against the project's objectives and user needs to determine what aligns best. 4. **Facilitate a Discussion**: Organize a meeting with stakeholders to openly discuss conflicting opinions and reach a consensus. 5. **Communicate Changes Clearly**: After deciding on adjustments, communicate the rationale behind changes to all stakeholders to ensure everyone is on the same page.

I prioritize clarity by listening carefully to all stakeholder input. Aligning diverse feedback ensures the final copy serves shared objectives. Strategic compromise blends creativity with the business goals in focus. The result? Optimized copy that satisfies everyone and drives results.