You're at odds with a product manager over UX design. How do you find common ground?

Well, if both sides are reasonable, you’ll figure it out. The best approach is to stay detached, focus on logic, and find a solution that works for the product and the users.

When I'm at odds with a product manager over UX design, I prioritize understanding their underlying goals. Often, disagreements stem from differing perspectives rather than actual conflicts. By openly discussing our objectives, we uncover shared priorities, like enhancing user satisfaction, boosting engagement, or improving business outcomes. Conducting collaborative workshops or brief user-testing sessions together helps reveal insights objectively, allowing both of us to see the real impact of each approach. In my opinion, emphasizing shared outcomes rather than specific methods fosters a collaborative environment, enabling us to align on a balanced, user-centered solution that meets both user needs and business goals.

Clarifying the product manager’s goals helps find alignment. Ask direct questions about what metrics or outcomes they’re aiming for, then clearly explain how UX improvements can support those goals. When you share a common understanding of objectives, it’s easier to discuss solutions productively.

Good UX isn’t a competing priority—it’s a growth lever. Product managers just need to see the connection. How do you frame UX improvements in a way that directly supports business and product goals?

User-centric data and collaborative problem-solving. We'll bridge the gap by focusing on shared goals: user success and business objectives. Using data-driven insights from user research, we'll collaboratively define clear priorities and iterate on designs, ensuring both UX principles and product requirements are met.

Use straightforward language, avoiding design jargon. Present ideas through visual examples or quick prototypes to illustrate your points. Clear, concise communication reduces misunderstandings and helps everyone see the practical value of proposed design changes.

If you can’t explain a UX decision without jargon, you probably don’t understand it well enough yourself. How do you make UX insights impossible to ignore for non-designers?

Clear communication is everything. It’s easy to get caught up in technical terms, but the goal is to connect on a human level. Instead of diving deep into design principles, focus on how the user experience directly impacts their goals like improving conversion rates or customer satisfaction. Use simple, everyday language and reallife examples to show the bigger picture. If you can make them see the journey through the user’s eyes, the design discussions become less about conflicting opinions and more about solving problems together. It’s all about making the business case for user-centered design, without overcomplicating things.

Show genuine understanding of the PM’s perspective. Acknowledge their pressures, constraints, or deadlines openly. Empathy doesn’t mean agreeing to everything; it means considering their viewpoint and making your UX suggestions fit realistically within their priorities.

Winning an argument won’t get your UX changes implemented—building trust will. How do you make product managers feel like UX is helping them, not fighting them?

Disagreements with a product manager can feel like a battle, but they don’t have to be. The key is empathy, putting yourself in their shoes and understanding the pressures they’re facing. They’ve got deadlines, business goals, and limited resources to juggle, just like we have user needs and design standards. Acknowledge their struggles and show you're willing to find a middle ground. Sometimes, it’s not about a perfect design, but about how to make smart trade-offs that satisfy both user experience and business objectives. When you approach it with empathy, the conversation shifts from a clash of priorities to a chance to collaborate and problem solve together.

Pick your battles carefully. Be ready to compromise on minor points but stand firm on critical UX principles that impact user satisfaction or product performance. Offer practical trade-offs, demonstrating flexibility without sacrificing essential quality standards.

Not every UX battle is worth fighting—win the ones that actually move the needle. How do you decide which UX principles to stand firm on and where to be flexible?

Compromise in UX design doesn’t mean giving up it means being strategic. Sometimes, you’ve got to fight for the parts of the design that will have the most impact on the user experience, like usability or accessibility. But for smaller issues, be open to finding solutions that work for both UX and the product goals. The trick is knowing where you can bend without breaking the user experience. Flexibility can actually spark fresh ideas, making the design better than you first imagined. When you balance standing your ground on key elements and being adaptable on others, everyone walks away happy.

Suggest quick tests or user feedback sessions to resolve disagreements. Real data from short usability tests helps move discussions away from personal opinions toward evidence-based decisions. Let the results speak clearly about what works best for users.

Data ends debates faster than opinions ever will. How do you use testing to turn UX disagreements into measurable outcomes?

Instead of getting stuck in a backand forth, testing gives you concrete data to back up your design decisions. Real user feedback shifts the conversation from subjective opinions to measurable results, making it easier to demonstrate why certain UX choices matter. Plus, testing opens up the opportunity to experiment and iterate, which often leads to fresh insights that neither side may have thought of. It’s all about showing that you’re focused on what works for the user and the product, data doesn’t lie, and it brings everyone on the same page.

After resolving conflicts, quickly reflect on what worked. Identify communication gaps or misunderstandings to improve next time. Adapting your collaboration style based on past interactions helps build stronger, more effective relationships moving forward.

Great UX isn’t just about iterating on designs—it’s about iterating on how you advocate for them. What’s one thing you’ve learned from past stakeholder conversations that changed how you approach UX discussions?