This will have to be set out from the start meeting. Everyone needs to be clear on what is expected. What I do my in cases when the client is done explaining what he/she wants I repeat it back and make sure nothing has been missed or misunderstood. Getting the correct information from the start and confirming the correct information normally leads to minimal revision changes.

Great insights! Managing revision expectations is indeed crucial for keeping projects on track and avoiding scope creep. In my experience, clear communication upfront is key. Along with specifying revision limits, I also ensure that the initial briefing phase is thorough to minimize the need for multiple revisions. Additionally, I find it helpful to include a detailed feedback template to streamline the revision process. Looking forward to hearing how others approach this challenge!

Before accepting any contract, I have a meeting to identify the client's needs and expectations, ensuring we're on the same page. In the contract, I specify the maximum number of revisions included in the initial fee and outline the cost for any extras, clarifying what counts as a revision to avoid misunderstandings. I set timeframes for feedback by establishing deadlines after each stage to keep the project on track. I also provide options for clients to purchase additional revisions if needed. To maintain transparency, I explain what constitutes major vs. minor changes and keep clients informed throughout the process. Finally, I track requests and progress to ensure alignment and avoid miscommunication.

A project is not driven by the number of revisions. It is driven by the contractual agreements, which customarily includes a schedule. Releasing a drawing version prior to internal checking and/or the resolution of known issues will, with certainty add more revisions. Lack of appropriate resources (human/etc) to your project will enhance this deficit and offer even more opportunities for endless revisions. Just care...

Getting to know the client and their likes and dislikes is a great start. Your introduction should be about the works that you like the best. Your Web presence should also reflect you. Having a better connection to the client could easily equal fewer revisions. All major revisions will be a signed addendum to the contract. Outlining the revision number, (I have dealt with a client that refuses to stop making revisions), costs, and project impact. The costs of constant revisions will need to increase with each change. Finally contract with a client needs to limit Architect participation during construction. Revisions after the start of construction are a nightmare.