At least one person should be both expert and experienced person; that person needs to take the last word when there are such disputes. Moreover, if someone is not able to prove to the others why the data are incorrect, then the team does not have an expert in that particular topic. The key is trying to prove why others are incorrect, and not trying to prove why I am correct. Expertise and experience is tested in those type of disputes: This is where you shall show your worth

In the midst of technical data disagreements in power engineering, I would first determine the cause of the differences and encourage candid communication among team members to ensure smooth project execution. The data can be validated by involving subject matter experts and using standardized data sources. To ensure openness, I would keep records of all conversations and decisions. I would also create a precise dispute resolution procedure to deal with problems promptly and equitably.

I will analyze and find the root cause of the data dispute . I will notify stakeholders and will document each and every task . Data has to be framed & updated regularly and it has to be properly communicated with the stakeholders of the project through transparency. Work plan and daily progress should be cross-verified with the associated professionals / stakeholders of the project. Open discussions are to be facilitated between the disputing parties. Tools and softwares should be used for maintaining the accurate data without consuming much time to avoid delays. Dispute resolution methodologies should be used , revision and review of data are also important. Care should be taken while updating the progress..