You're facing conflicting feedback from multiple code reviewers. How do you navigate through it all?

Conflicting feedback from code reviewers can be overwhelming, but it's an opportunity to refine your work. Start by identifying patterns—are there common issues being flagged? Prioritize those first. Next, assess the experience of each reviewer; a senior developer may have broader context. Don’t hesitate to ask clarifying questions if something is unclear. In a recent project, I received conflicting feedback on variable naming conventions. By facilitating a quick discussion, we aligned on a standard that satisfied all reviewers, ensuring code consistency moving forward. Clear communication and collaboration are key to navigating conflicting feedback effectively.

Categorize the feedback into different areas, such as functionality, style, and performance. Identify which points are universally agreed upon and address those first. For conflicting feedback, set up a brief discussion with the reviewers to understand their perspectives and the rationale behind their suggestions. Seek common ground by combining the best aspects of their feedback or proposing a compromise. Document the decisions made and the reasons for them to ensure clarity. Communicate the approach to all reviewers to align expectations and maintain transparency. Eventually, it will harmonize diverse viewpoints and streamline the review process.

When you receive a review of the code, first let you understand each of them and filter out the common scenarios from them. Now remaining shall be the unique reviews and work on that. While reviewing it keep things in mind that let you understand the code first before removing/modifying it.

You follow the logic and do your own research. Check on wich you believe is correct and move on. Is not a matter of whos correct, you have to check both perspectives and check wich ones applys better to your case and why.

When facing conflicting feedback from multiple code reviewers, the first step is to carefully review each piece of feedback and identify common themes or concerns. Prioritize feedback based on project requirements, team standards, and best practices. If certain suggestions conflict, engage in a constructive discussion with the reviewers to clarify their reasoning and reach a consensus. Consider the broader impact of each change on code quality, performance, and maintainability. When necessary, consult with a senior developer or project lead for guidance. Balancing constructive input with your own judgment ensures a better final product.