登录查看更多内容

You're a content manager. Are you making these common logical reasoning mistakes?

由人工智能和领英社区提供技术支持

As a content manager, you have to deal with a lot of information, data, and arguments. You need to be able to evaluate the quality, relevance, and validity of your sources, as well as your own assumptions and conclusions. However, sometimes you might fall prey to some common logical reasoning mistakes that can undermine your credibility, accuracy, and effectiveness. Here are some examples of logical fallacies that you should avoid or spot in your content management work.

此文章中的业界达人

由社区从 6 条内容中精选。了解更多

Madhuri M

Tech journalist I write the 'CONTENT' & 'COPIES' that your brand might love Come, let’s talk!

1 False dilemma

A false dilemma is a type of logical fallacy that presents only two options or outcomes, when in fact there are more possibilities. For example, you might think that you have to choose between creating more content or improving the quality of your existing content, when you could actually do both or find a balance. A false dilemma can limit your creativity, flexibility, and problem-solving skills. It can also make you appear biased or manipulative to your audience.

添加您的观点

Madhuri M

Tech journalist I write the 'CONTENT' & 'COPIES' that your brand might love Come, let’s talk!
举报内容
This occurs when you present only two options as if they're the only possibilities. As a content manager, avoid making statements like "You either create click-worthy headlines or your content flops." There are many factors influencing content success.

已翻译

赞

2 Hasty generalization

A hasty generalization is a type of logical fallacy that draws a conclusion based on insufficient or unrepresentative evidence. For example, you might assume that all your readers are interested in a certain topic or have a certain level of knowledge, based on a few comments or feedback. A hasty generalization can lead to inaccurate, irrelevant, or misleading content. It can also alienate or offend your audience if you ignore their diversity and preferences.

添加您的观点

Madhuri M

Tech journalist I write the 'CONTENT' & 'COPIES' that your brand might love Come, let’s talk!
举报内容
Here, you jump to a broad conclusion based on limited evidence. Don't say "All social media posts with funny pictures go viral" after seeing a few examples. Consider the target audience, timing, and content quality for better results.

已翻译

赞

3 Post hoc ergo propter hoc

Post hoc ergo propter hoc is a type of logical fallacy that assumes that because one event follows another, the first event caused the second event. For example, you might attribute the success or failure of your content to a specific factor, such as the time of publication, the headline, or the format, without considering other possible causes or effects. Post hoc ergo propter hoc can result in false or incomplete causal claims. It can also prevent you from learning from your mistakes or improving your performance.

添加您的观点

Madhuri M

Tech journalist I write the 'CONTENT' & 'COPIES' that your brand might love Come, let’s talk!
举报内容
Hoc (Latin for "after this, therefore because of this"): This fallacy assumes that because one event happened after another, the first caused the second. Avoid statements like "We launched a new website, and sales dropped, so the website must be bad." Other factors could be at play.

已翻译

赞

4 Appeal to authority

An appeal to authority is a type of logical fallacy that relies on the opinion or expertise of a person or source, without evaluating their credibility, relevance, or evidence. For example, you might use a quote or a statistic from a famous or influential person or organization, without checking their background, context, or accuracy. An appeal to authority can undermine your own authority and responsibility. It can also misinform or deceive your audience if you use unreliable or outdated sources.

添加您的观点

Madhuri M

Tech journalist I write the 'CONTENT' & 'COPIES' that your brand might love Come, let’s talk!
举报内容
This relies solely on someone's reputation to prove a point. It's okay to cite experts, but ensure their credentials are relevant and consider alternative viewpoints for a well-rounded perspective.

已翻译

赞

5 Straw man

A straw man is a type of logical fallacy that distorts or misrepresents an opposing argument or position, making it easier to attack or refute. For example, you might oversimplify or exaggerate a counterpoint or a criticism, without addressing its actual substance or validity. A straw man can damage your credibility and reputation. It can also create unnecessary conflict or hostility with your audience if you disrespect or misunderstand their views.

添加您的观点

Madhuri M

Tech journalist I write the 'CONTENT' & 'COPIES' that your brand might love Come, let’s talk!
举报内容
You misrepresent someone's argument to make it easier to attack. Don't claim someone wants to abolish social media when they simply advocate for responsible usage. Focus on addressing the actual argument for a productive discussion.

已翻译

赞

6 Confirmation bias

Confirmation bias is a type of logical fallacy that involves favoring or seeking information that confirms your existing beliefs or expectations, while ignoring or dismissing information that contradicts them. For example, you might select or interpret data or feedback that supports your content goals or strategies, while rejecting or overlooking data or feedback that challenges them. Confirmation bias can impair your judgment and objectivity. It can also hinder your growth and innovation if you resist change or feedback.

添加您的观点

7 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

添加您的观点

Samit Banerjee

CONTENT Strategist | Planner | Creator | Marketer
举报内容
There is nothing to deny that every content manager faces with some or the other logical reasoning fallacies as listed. I have been in this domain for the last 1.5 decades and many times have come across such fallacies that hampered my performance. Instead of getting ruled by these logical reasoning errors, it's always wise to come out of the cubicle and take some breaks. In my experience, the reason behind such fallacies is either the unreadiness of the mind to understand something or getting overstressed with work. To prevent such situations, I take frequent breaks and prevent continuous sitting and working. This gives the brain some space. You can also read something that is not close to the subject of your work.

已翻译

赞

Content Management

+ 关注

给文章评分

我们借助人工智能创建了此文章。您认为这篇文章怎么样？

很棒不太好

举报此文章

查看全部

You're a content manager. Are you making these common logical reasoning mistakes?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 False dilemma

2 Hasty generalization

3 Post hoc ergo propter hoc

4 Appeal to authority

5 Straw man

6 Confirmation bias

7 Here’s what else to consider

Content Management

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

更多Content Management相关文章

更多相关阅读内容

You're a content manager. Are you making these common logical reasoning mistakes?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 False dilemma

2 Hasty generalization

3 Post hoc ergo propter hoc

4 Appeal to authority

5 Straw man

6 Confirmation bias

7 Here’s what else to consider

Content Management

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

查看其他技能