Your team is resistant to code reviews. How can you convince them of its importance?

From my experience - code review is the best way to learn and teach each other. A programmer can spend hours watching tutorials and remember nothing. But he/she will certainly remember if you leave a comment with a better solution. And it works the other way around as well. When you review others' code and think "what the F*!", but before writing an angry comment you try to understand and suddenly notice that "hey, that's actually a neat solution!" - you won't forget that either. Code review is a place where you can get and give knowledge right where the task is. I both learned and taught a lot via code reviews. I see it as the most polite and active and useful way of improving your skills.

As an engineering leader, I have seen firsthand how code reviews significantly enhance our development process. By catching bugs early and ensuring adherence to coding standards, code reviews elevate our code quality. They go beyond merely identifying mistakes; they foster knowledge sharing and best practices, enabling our team members to learn from one another and grow their skills. This peer learning culture strengthens our team, making it more versatile and capable. Implementing code reviews showcases our commitment to a mature, collaborative, and continuously improving development process.

Reinforce that the code review will not be a moment of judgment, but rather of reflection and sharing of knowledge. Furthermore, it can be a great opportunity to get mentored and get closer support that can benefit the developer's professional growth and improve team/management communication. Seek to bring clear communication and a comprehensive approach, making the developer comfortable with that moment, and encouraging him to evolve personally and professionally. Be an example.

We must be professionals in every aspect of our work life, and this includes giving code reviews. Code reviews should involve empathy and clear instructions on how to improve the code. When denying a merge, we must be polite and communicate effectively about what can be improved in the co-worker's code. Negative feedback is not about bringing someone down; it's about encouraging future improvement.

Be considerate when doing code reviews, keeping in mind that your team may interpret them as assessments of their abilities. Stress that the objective is to work together to produce the best product, not to criticize one another. Reassure them that equal scrutiny is applied to all codes, encouraging shared responsibility and accountability. You may promote a good attitude toward code reviews by cultivating a culture of constructive feedback.

We have to ensure processes. Sometimes, this can be tedious, but it's necessary to maintain standards because the ends do not justify the means. Keeping your code clean and readable, and focusing on predefined benchmarks, will accelerate future activities, reduce the number of bugs, and make the remaining ones much simpler to investigate and fix.

As you generate the process you can target differen aspects for the review the focus to avoid being overly cumbersome and to fix issues in a gradual manner. Once you see the coders have improved in one area change the focus to the next. This can be tailored for each coder to improve their skills and bring them up to par, or can be done across for all.

Example is not just a way to lead, it's the only way. To truly ensure best practices, standards, and code patterns throughout the entire project, as leaders, we must take action first. Start by implementing those standards ourselves and consistently communicate our thought process to the team, so they can absorb it and help create a culture around it.

Leading by example is crucial in demonstrating the importance of code reviews to your team. Here’s how you can effectively showcase their significance: Active Participation: Show your team that code reviews are not just a checkbox but a valuable opportunity for collaboration and improvement. Actively engage in reviews, offering constructive feedback and acknowledging good practices. Mentorship Opportunity: Use code reviews as a platform for mentorship. Share your expertise and guide less experienced team members, helping them grow professionally. Highlight Impact: Illustrate how your involvement in code reviews improves code quality and team cohesion.

Leading by example is essential to promoting code reviews. Actively participate in the process, offering thoughtful and constructive feedback. Demonstrate how code reviews can serve as opportunities for mentorship and leadership. Your enthusiasm and commitment will be contagious; when team members witness the positive impact of your involvement, they'll be more inclined to engage and value the process. By modeling best practices and highlighting the benefits, you can inspire your team to embrace code reviews as a crucial part of their development workflow.

Code reviews should be taken very seriously instead of doing for process name-sake. Most of the time people are not aware what actually needs to be reviewed. Training is the key to help team understand better about code reviews, here are some points what should be checked during a code review: - Code should abide by the latest language specific coding standards - Code should be as per the company's defined company coding guidelines: e.g. configuring checkstyle to write clean code, adding good comments - To check code efficiency: If there is scope for optimization - To check code simplicity avoiding unnecessary complexity - To check code functionality if it covers all the scenarios and cases - To look for any exceptions code could run into

Providing training can demystify the code review process and boost team confidence. Organize sessions to discuss best practices for writing review-friendly code and giving effective feedback. This sets clear expectations and reduces anxiety. By empowering your team with the necessary skills through training, you enable them to participate confidently and constructively in code reviews. This proactive approach fosters a supportive environment where code reviews are seen as a valuable, integral part of the development process.

To begin with inform and educate the team about the recommended processes that must be followed to ensure the robustness and accuracy of any code. Request teammates to review the coding done by you and take their feedbacks and implement the relevant suggestions.

I encourage everyone to share their thoughts and feedback on our code review process. I make it clear that I value their input and that I'm open to making changes based on what we learn from these discussions. This approach shows my team that their opinions matter and that I'm committed to improving our process together. Regularly talking about the benefits and challenges of code reviews is also important. By keeping these discussions ongoing, we highlight the importance of code reviews and ensure that everyone understands their value. This helps us gradually build a culture where code reviews are seen as a crucial part of our software development process.

Sometimes, code reviews become mere formalities, with reviewers skimming through the code to meet process requirements rather than providing meaningful feedback. This can lead to a false sense of security and unchecked code issues slipping through. Code reviews can also become tools for gatekeeping, where senior developers use them to assert dominance over less experienced team members. This can stifle innovation and discourage newer developers from contributing freely. Keep an eye on code reviews and establish rules to ensure feedback is objective.