When your team is divided on risk levels, it's crucial to assess risks collectively. Start by bringing everyone together to openly discuss concerns and potential rewards. Encourage a balanced dialogue where each viewpoint is considered, analyzing the data and projections as a group. Weigh the risks against the opportunity for growth, ensuring everyone understands the bigger picture. This collaborative approach fosters trust and helps align the team, ultimately leading to a more informed, unified decision on the project.

I love it when we have diverse viewpoints for any discussion especially a new project. It helps us see things from different angles and assess the pros and cons. We use the age old technique of open communication - brainstorming in a meeting room or virtually, sharing our ideas and debating them until we arrive at a unanimous decision. We don't leave the room with a question lingering inside anyone's head. And as a rule the person whose ideas will be taken forward can be done so only after he/she convinces the others. But we leave the room with one singular decision.

- Start by listening to all viewpoints carefully and understand the reasons behind each risk level. Make everyone feel heard, and ensure you grasp their concerns before jumping to conclusions. - Find common ground by identifying overlapping goals and interests. Even if opinions differ, there’s usually a shared objective that everyone cares about. Use this as a foundation to steer the team toward a balanced decision. - Encourage a test-and-learn approach to manage the risk. Agree on a small step that everyone can get behind, then evaluate the results together. This way, you’re taking action while minimizing potential downsides.

Navigating conflicting viewpoints on risk requires a balanced approach. First, create space for everyone to share their concerns and ideas openly. Acknowledge both the conservative and risk-taking perspectives to show each side is valued. Then, use data and scenarios to evaluate potential outcomes—what’s the best-case, worst-case, and most likely scenario? From there, seek common ground by finding a compromise, such as piloting a small-scale version of the project or setting clear checkpoints to reassess risk levels. This way, you incorporate caution while still allowing room for innovation.