To navigate the conflict between your innovative problem-solving and company protocols, try these steps: 1. Understand Protocols: Learn why they exist to better align your ideas with their goals. 2. Frame as Improvement: Present innovations as enhancements to existing processes, emphasizing benefits like efficiency or cost savings. 3. Build Support: Start by sharing ideas with colleagues or supervisors open to change. 4. Pilot Programs: Suggest small tests to show the value of your ideas. 5. Collaborate: Engage key stakeholders and respect their role. 6. Highlight Benefits: Focus on clear, tangible advantages to the company. This balances innovation with structure effectively.

If your problem solving approach conflicts companies policy I advise you start thinking of an alternative approach while you do the following; Communicate to your superior or director on the advantages of your approach and inform him/her clearly about the clash with company policy. You can choose to try your approach on a small scale and see it's benefit. If your approach will have an adverse effect in future please rethink but if it's something that will be of long term advantage do your best to convince. Please document every agreement, because you signed company policies and it's a legal document that can be used against you. So any step of this your approach document and if possible get your company to sign a permit to execute.

- Understand the Rationale: I would first seek to understand the underlying reasons for the company's protocols. - Present Data and Evidence: I would gather data and evidence to support my claims. - Collaborate with Stakeholders: I would involve relevant stakeholders in the discussion, including my manager, team members, and potentially subject matter experts. - Compromise and Adaptation: If my innovative approach cannot be fully implemented, I would be open to compromise and adaptation. This might involve modifying the protocol, conducting a pilot test, or implementing the solution in a limited scope. Ultimately, my goal would be to find a solution that is both innovative and compliant with company standards.

It's essential to understand why the current protocol exists, as it's often designed for consistency, compliance, risk mitigation, or efficiency. By recognizing its purpose, you can better assess its value and potential flexibility. It's important to map out the specific areas where your approach deviates and determine whether these conflicts are well understood by others. Engage stakeholders to explain your reasoning, and if the process is outdated, emphasize the benefits of your solution—such as improved efficiency or reduced risks—while respecting the protocol's purpose. Strike a balance between advocating for change and respecting the framework that’s already in place. Can incremental adaptation work rather than a wholesale change?