What are some of the key factors to consider when selecting a design and construction team for your project?

? We must be careful that in choosing resources for design and construction, our selection index is not only cost. Usually, companies or individuals try to zoom in for their own presentation. ? In order to evaluate and verify the claims, we must research or use the evaluation and qualification systems of authorities such as standard departments or technical and engineering associations. ?? Several factors can affect our level of accuracy to evaluate and control companies: ? Cost scale and project investment ? The complexity of the activity and its technical uncertainties ? The period of time provided for it ? Access to raw materials and its implementation technology And ...

Design team selection and construction team selection cannot be lumped under one process. Design team selection should be based on the type of projects they have completed , which should be similar to the project under consideration. Another important aspect is selecting the design team based on the culture of the project. A residential development project team is normally selected based on fee, speed they can produce work, and their past experience. However, a construction team is normally based on price, although experience in similar projects is also a must. Another important item in construction team selection is their company culture. Do they like nickle and dime for even minor changes.

Many company have individuals with various skills some are junior and other are senior .When they put the team together they include both ,but client should zoom on when the skillful people are proposed to work on that particular project and for how long ( companies want to make money at the end of the day) .Therefore the period of the skillful senior resources are limited. In my experience you need the skillful experienced resources at the beginning of the project (design formation and major engineering systems decisions), and at the commissioning and final stage of the project to ensure quality and regulatory compliances, and the scope of work is complete and well coordinated .

when prequalifying a design consultant you must keep in mind that the design consultant should understand the culture of the place that he is going to design for, having big names isn't everything. And always ask for references

Regulation compliance is also a must, as it ensures that the team follows all necessary laws and regulations related to the project. Availability is another factor determining whether the team can take on the project and devote enough time and resources. Innovative thinking is also vital, as it can help the team develop creative and practical solutions to any challenges that may arise during the project.

Certainly, in addition to their qualifications, we should also assess whether they have an excessive workload with other projects. Regardless of their qualifications, if they are already heavily committed to other tasks, I would refrain from engaging them.

success breeds success, but innovation is also a critical component to move design and utility to improved product. While accolades work to perceived value, but the best is the underlying design that proves value.

Awards, LEED, ISO, BREEAM, etc are not good indicators of a good firm. These certificates are from large firms working on high budget projects. One should look into energy star rating for example instead of LEED Gold. ISO 9001 means the firm abides by is own quality control and no more, not a standard of quality, highly misleading.

This is the 'background check' phase. Ensure that the firms have the necessary licenses, permits, and insurance to operate in your jurisdiction. Verify their credentials and look for quality indicators like LEED, ISO, or BREEAM certifications. This is like checking the safety ratings and features when you're buying a car; you want to make sure it's reliable and up to standard.

In the past (medieval times, as told in history)people went through apprenticeship to become professionals of high integrity. In our quest for high and big education standings we should not ignore the great achievement through practical working experience we may have reliable references of those with/without knowledge in standards, codes, certificate etc.

?In all calls, tenders and inquiries of projects, we come across proposals that are so-called data outliers. ?? These proposals are either much cheaper than our estimations, which we usually encounter during the project with low quality and also many claims from them. ?? ??The second category is the proposals that are very expensive and are basically more than 40% away from our estimate, which will definitely be rejected if they do not have a valid reason to calculate our values and fees. ? In my opinion, every project has a range of fees, time, and services, and proposals that are up to 25% higher or lower than that can be reviewed and selected with less risk.

This situation can be complex, and my usual approach is to consult with a lawyer to review the payment terms and fine print. When everything is going smoothly, it's all good, but having this protection becomes invaluable when difficulties arise. DG1

So long as budgets are maintained, expensive starting platform for expensive cost, value proposition can be maintained and recoverable.

Look for those that show understanding of scope and request how they can improve the Owner's objectives. One lump sump fee proposals should be considered only for small projects.

Discovering that you have poor communicators while in the design-build process is like trying to fix a leaky boat that is already under sail. One of the reasons that I have worked certain groups or people repeatedly is because of past success. During the interview process I like to make sure I am talking to the folks that will be my key contacts - and that they have enough character to direct the team. It is important that the team understand that this is not about their individual egos, that this is a team of professionals with a project in mind. In order to get the most fruitful collaboration it is necessary to establish clear goals and clear boundaries (like budgets). Check the progress and be clear on changes and new direction.

Demonstrable evidence of collaboration on previous projects is essential. Every project will experience a level of challenge and change, and when it does, a coordinated team response will be required. Each discipline will need to play their part.

Conducting Owner, Architect/Engineer, & Contractor (OAC) Meetings can be effective to bring multiple stakeholders together to address project items and answer questions/issues during projects. The frequency can be once a week or even once a month depending on what all parties agree on.

As per my more than 35 years experience in Construction The most important skills must be consider Communication Emotional Management And solving of the conflict

Look for those wo react fast to a situation, consider urgency and own their mistakes. Look for attitide.... "There is always a solution" attitude. I would stay away from designers with "strategic parterships and alliances" with builders, all they do in their strategic alliances is cover for each other's mistakes and rubber stamp things.

I find that focusing solely on slogans and banners can be a time-consuming endeavor. While everyone can display these, what truly matters to me is personally assessing the character of the team members.

It is important that from the onset of any potential collaboration with design and construction teams, time is spent evaluating value alignment between the Developer and the design/construction team. This has a huge impact on the success or failure of a project.

For a construction company, evaluating its current projects, financial stability, and management decisions would be crucial. While online reviews and testimonials offer insights, a strong historical reputation and past work completed successfully often play a significant role in assessing a construction company's credibility. It's essential to consider both current management practices and the company's track record for a comprehensive evaluation.

The baseline qualifications for most major contractors tell you very little. Everyone who qualifies for a project is going to have adequate bonding capacity, resumes with years of experience, slogans that express a shared sense of mission. When you select a GC, you are selecting the team that will run a business over multiple years and potentially worth hundreds of millions of dollars. Treat it the same way you would if they were joining your staff. Be fully conscious about their motivations, and provide them the tools they need to succeed.

In the dynamic GCC construction and real estate scene, the right design and construction team are pivotal. Leveraging my candidate placement experience, key factors include: ?????????????????? ?????? ???????????????????? Placed a seasoned project manager, completing a large-scale project six months ahead, exceeding expectations. ???????????????????? ?????????????????? Placed a creative design manager, saving 15% in potential overrun costs by addressing site challenges. ???????? ?????????????? ???????????????????? Recruited a cost control manager, achieving 12% cost reduction through value engineering without compromising quality. Strategic hiring is imperative when building a team, turning it into an investment rather than just a cost.

Risk management is also important, as it helps the team identify and mitigate potential risks that could negatively impact the project. Finally, cultural fit is crucial, as it ensures that the team can work effectively with the client and other stakeholders involved in the project.

you have to see the consultant's previous experience as well you need to make sure that he accomplished projects similar to yours.

Flexibility: Choose a team that can easily adapt to unexpected changes or challenges that most certainly will arise during the project.

There is one thing missed out, availability of the team. No points if they are cheap, expert, qualified, certified, but they are fully loaded. They still can’t deliver your projects.