What are some common analytical problem solving frameworks used in R&D?

The beauty of the scientific method is the fact that it evolves upon itself, it is self-correcting. Your hypothesis is proven to be a theory/truth, only until a better hypothesis is brought to the table and it produces better and more repeatable results. It is a virtuous cycle. As in the great scientist Carl Sagan's words; “Science is not perfect. It’s often misused; it’s only a tool, but it’s the best tool we have. Self-correcting, ever changing, applicable to everything: with this tool, we vanquish the impossible.”

Common analytical problem-solving frameworks in R&D include the 5 Whys (asking "why" repeatedly to find root causes), SWOT Analysis (evaluating Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats), Root Cause Analysis (finding the primary cause of a problem), and the PDCA cycle (Plan-Do-Check-Act for continuous improvement).

In medical devices, a common regulatory framework for introducing new devices in the US is showing equivalence to existing devices ( called 510k) . In that case, characterizing an existing device creates a baseline against which the new device’s performance can be measured.

Empathy is your superpower in this framework. Immerse yourself in the shoes of your users, understand their needs and pain points, and then brainstorm creative solutions. Prototype quickly, test, iterate, and refine your ideas until you land on a user-centric solution that resonates. Remember, innovation thrives on understanding the human element.

It is important to identify all the significant users of the device. Some of them may be quite obvious, but others may not be. As an example, a medical device’s may be thought off as the patient, but surgeons, Operating room staff etc also need to be thoughtfully considered.

For those who love a good process, the DMAIC cycle is your jam. Define the problem, Measure its impact, Analyze its root causes, Improve existing processes, and Control their effectiveness. Think of it as a continuous improvement loop, helping you streamline your R&D efforts and eliminate waste, leading to more efficient problem-solving.

Stuck in a rut of conventional solutions? The TRIZ method, born from the study of successful inventions, can spark your creativity. Use its 40 inventive principles to systematically challenge assumptions, overcome contradictions, and identify innovative solutions. Think of it as a mental toolbox, overflowing with unconventional approaches to unlock hidden potential in your problem.

For those who love to break down complex problems into bite-sized chunks, the Kepner-Tregoe method is your friend. This structured approach involves identifying the problem, analyzing its causes and consequences, developing and evaluating solutions, and implementing the chosen solution. Think of it as a logical scalpel, dissecting the problem with precision and clarity.

Bonus Tip: Remember, these frameworks are not rigid formulas; they're flexible tools to be adapted to your specific needs. Mix and match, experiment, and find the approach that best resonates with your unique R&D challenges.

Common analytical problem-solving frameworks in R&D include Six Sigma, Lean, and Design Thinking. Six Sigma focuses on process improvement, reducing defects, and statistical analysis. Lean emphasizes efficiency and waste reduction. Design Thinking promotes creative problem-solving through empathy, ideation, and prototyping. Unconventional advice: Integrate diverse perspectives; involve cross-functional teams to foster innovation. Embrace failure as a learning opportunity, encouraging a culture that values experimentation and adaptability. This can enhance problem-solving agility in R&D settings.

Une des méthodes utilisée en résolution de problèmes complexes s'applique parfaitement à la R&D. La méthode 4S pour Spécifier (State), Structurer (Structure), Solutionner (Solve), Scénariser (Sell). Bien spécifier un problème consiste à le définir correctement en ne confondant pas le sujet à résoudre de la manière dont on cherche à résoudre une idée fulgurante. Structurer le problème consiste à le décomposer en problèmes plus élémentaires. Solutionner par des méthodes diverses et variées chaque sous-problème. Scénariser... une excellente solution mal vendue sera toujours moins bien accueillie qu'une mauvaise solution bien vendue !!