What are the pros and cons of Apache Kafka, Apache Flink, and Apache Spark for data streaming?

由人工智能和领英社区提供技术支持

Data streaming is the process of continuously ingesting, processing, and analyzing large volumes of real-time data from various sources, such as sensors, web logs, social media, or online transactions. Data streaming enables applications to react to events, monitor trends, detect anomalies, and generate insights in near real-time. However, data streaming also poses many challenges, such as scalability, fault-tolerance, latency, and consistency. To address these challenges, several data streaming platforms and frameworks have emerged, each with its own features, strengths, and limitations. In this article, we will compare three popular data streaming solutions: Apache Kafka, Apache Flink, and Apache Spark.

此文章中的业界达人

由社区从 5 条内容中精选。了解更多

1 Apache Kafka

Apache Kafka is a distributed messaging system that can handle high-throughput, low-latency, and reliable data streams. It uses a publish-subscribe model where producers send messages to topics and consumers subscribe to topics and consume messages. Additionally, Kafka provides a storage layer that can retain messages for a configurable period of time, allowing consumers to replay or reprocess data if needed. It is designed to scale horizontally, handle failures gracefully, and support multiple data formats and protocols. Some of the advantages of Kafka are its ability to handle millions of messages per second with low overhead and latency, its integration with various data sources and sinks such as databases, Hadoop, Spark, Flink or Elasticsearch, its support for complex data pipelines with Kafka Connect and Kafka Streams APIs for data ingestion and stream processing, and its guarantee of exactly-once delivery and processing semantics with transactions and idempotent producers. However, there are some disadvantages to using Kafka such as careful configuration and tuning is necessary to optimize performance and resource utilization, it does not provide built-in support for advanced stream processing features like windowing, aggregation or state management, it does not guarantee the order of messages across different partitions of a topic which may affect the logic of some applications, and it does not offer native support for batch processing or machine learning which may require additional frameworks or tools.

添加您的观点

Melis A.

DATA detective | Blockchain | B2B | AIaaS & SaaS MKT
举报内容
Let me tell about disadvantages: - Optimizing Kafka’s performance and resource utilization requires careful configuration and tuning. This includes setting appropriate replication factors, partition counts, and retention policies. - Kafka’s performance is highly dependent on the underlying infrastructure, including disk I/O, network bandwidth, and memory usage. Misconfiguration can lead to resource bottlenecks. - While Kafka Streams provides stream processing capabilities, it lacks built-in support for advanced features like windowing, aggregation, or state management. For more complex stream processing, additional frameworks like Apache Flink or Apache Spark may be required. and more...

已翻译

赞
Zabeer Farook

Technical Architect | AWS SA-Associate | CKA
举报内容
Apache Kafka is a distributed event streaming platform. It can handle large volumes of data, is highly scalable, and provides low latency and fault tolerance. Kafka provides a powerful yet simple Producer and Consumer APIs and it's useful for publishing and subscribing to events.Kafka streams API and ksqlDB can be used to implement data streaming pipelines using a programming language and SQL respectively Kafka Connect is another powerful extension to implement data integration use cases by moving data between data between different relational/NoSQL databases, Data Lakes etc. Some of the disadvantages are - Complex infrastructure to self manage - Huge set of configuration parameters - Not the best for large scale stateful processing

已翻译

赞
Dylan Pulver

Senior Software Developer | Specialist in Full-Cycle Development & Advanced Data Systems | Proven Success in System Architecture & Operational Efficiency | Exploring Opportunities in Tech Leadership & Startups
举报内容
1. Kafka Pros: Handles high-throughput and low-latency data streams with reliability. Scales horizontally and integrates well with other systems like Spark and Flink. Supports exactly-once processing and data replay. 2. Kafka Cons: Requires careful configuration and tuning. Lacks advanced stream processing features and does not guarantee message order across partitions. No native support for batch processing or machine learning. 3. Use Case: Best for high-throughput messaging and durable log storage, but may need complementary tools for complex stream processing or analytics.

已翻译

赞

2 Apache Flink

Apache Flink is a distributed stream processing framework that is capable of handling real-time and batch data with high performance and accuracy. It utilizes a dataflow model, where data streams are transformed into new streams by operators, and has a fault-tolerant runtime that can recover from any failures without compromising data or consistency. Flink further offers features such as event-time semantics, windowing, aggregation, joins, complex event processing, and iterative algorithms. The advantages of Flink include its ability to process data streams with low latency and high throughput, as well as support both stream and batch processing with a unified API and runtime. Additionally, it provides exactly-once processing and delivery semantics with checkpoints and savepoints, which are snapshots of the state and position of the data streams. Flink also integrates with various data sources and sinks such as Kafka, Hadoop, Cassandra, or Elasticsearch, while supporting SQL, Python, Scala, and Java APIs. On the other hand, some of the disadvantages of Flink are its steep learning curve to master its concepts and APIs; higher resource consumption compared to other frameworks; incompatibility with some legacy or proprietary data formats or protocols; and lack of maturity compared to other frameworks due to its continuous development.

添加您的观点

Zabeer Farook

Technical Architect | AWS SA-Associate | CKA
举报内容
Apache Flink is a popular open source distributed stream processing framework which provides low latency, high throughout, fault tolerance with exactly once support. The USP about Flink is its support for unified batch and stream processing where any input source is treated as either a bounded or unbounded stream. It also supports event time processing. Stream processing pipelines can be written in Java, Scala, Python or even SQL. It's a perfect choice for large-scale stateful stream processing with low latency and high throughout requirements. Flink SQL provides a SQL friendly way to define stream processing pipelines.? Flink has a relatively steep learning curve especially around the event time and state management semantics.

已翻译

赞

3 Apache Spark

Apache Spark is a distributed computing framework that can handle large-scale data processing quickly and easily. It uses a resilient distributed dataset (RDD) model, which partitions and distributes data across multiple nodes and enables parallel operations. Spark's structured streaming API allows users to process data streams as if they were tables or datasets. It also supports features such as batch processing, stream processing, SQL queries, machine learning, graph analysis, and R and Python APIs. The advantages of Spark include its ability to process data with high speed and efficiency due to its in-memory caching and lazy evaluation techniques, its support for a wide range of data processing tasks and scenarios with its rich set of libraries and APIs, its ability to leverage the existing Hadoop ecosystem and infrastructure, and its fault-tolerance and reliability from recomputing lost partitions of the RDDs. However, some of the disadvantages of Spark are that it may not handle real-time data streams as well as other frameworks due to its use of micro-batching rather than true streaming; it may not provide the same level of consistency and accuracy as other frameworks due to its lack of event-time semantics or exactly-once processing semantics for streaming data; it may not scale well for very large or complex data sets or applications due to potential memory or network issues or bottlenecks; and it may require more maintenance and tuning to optimize its configuration and performance.

添加您的观点

Zabeer Farook

Technical Architect | AWS SA-Associate | CKA
举报内容
Apache Spark is a distributed batch processing framework which can process huge volumes of batch data with high throughout. It also supports stream processing using a micro batch approach. Spark is an ideal choice for high volume batch processing use cases.? Spark jobs can be written in Java, Scala, Python and SQL. It may not be the ideal choice for low latency realtime stream processing use cases compared to Kafka Streams and Flink

已翻译

赞

4 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

添加您的观点

Data Acquisition

+ 关注

给文章评分

我们借助人工智能创建了此文章。您认为这篇文章怎么样？

很棒不太好

举报此文章

查看全部

What are the pros and cons of Apache Kafka, Apache Flink, and Apache Spark for data streaming?

1

2

3

4

1 Apache Kafka

2 Apache Flink

3 Apache Spark

4 Here’s what else to consider

Data Acquisition

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

更多Data Acquisition相关文章

更多相关阅读内容