What are the most efficient 2D CAD software tools for your team to use?

Die Effizienz l?sst sich in vielerlei Hinsicht bewerten. Gerade der Umstand, dass 2D Zeichnungen noch gro?teils in der Fertigung und bei der Bedienung von alten Maschinenparks eingesetzt wird definiert den Begriff Effizienz sehr weitl?ufig. Weitere Kriterien: -) Import- und Exportm?glichkeiten -) Performancekriterien -) Usability -) API-Schnittstelle -) Druck M?glichkeiten -) Spline/Kurven Interpretation -) Rasterdatenumwandlung -) Kompatibilit?t mit 3D-CAD Programmen ... um nur einige zu nennen...

La elección de la herramienta de software CAD 2D para tu equipo. Aquí hay algunas opciones populares y eficientes: AutoCAD: Este es como el veterano confiable en el mundo del CAD. Es ampliamente utilizado y conocido por su versatilidad, ofreciendo una amplia gama de funciones tanto en 2D como en 3D. DraftSight: no solo es gratuito, sino que también es compatible con archivos DWG y tiene una interfaz intuitiva, haciendo que la transición sea suave. BricsCAD: es una opción para considerar. No solo ofrece funcionalidades tanto en 2D como en 3D, sino que también es conocido por su rendimiento y compatibilidad con archivos DWG. NanoCAD: Con funciones básicas y una interfaz familiar, es una opción ligera pero efectiva para proyectos en 2D.

For 2D Cad i prefer Autocad from Autodesk for generated 2D Cad Projects . but every software i best , basically i depend how you use the software .

2D CAD is not efficient enough for me to utilize any more. It is no longer worth the effort. The only thing I will use a flat 2d cad file for is details or reviewing civil files or old work that came from that age. And then I am still converting to, or linking to Revit models. I still use autocad for a file converter from time to time, but I don't like wasting time. Working in 3 dimensions gives me options to cut sections of live models, make elevations, enlarged plans and not have to worry about layers and annotations. Why focus on making drafting views and viewports look accurate when I can model one time and have as many views to show my intent as possible? Unless making 2d edits, not worth the hassle.

2D drafting, would prefer BricsCAD, AutoCAD and Cadmate. But BricsCAD & Cadmate softer ware are free available setup. same short keys like AutoCAD It’s widely used in academia and also in industry and oil and gas companies, and is easy to use for 2D sketches such as shop drawing.

Teams often face limitations in software choice due to widespread use of a particular option, which may not be the most proficient for a specific industry or country. Therefore, selecting the best software should primarily hinge on its ability to effectively handle file formats used by both the new software and counterparts or external teams.

I think below are the key aspects to look for Ease of Use Drawing and Editing Features Accuracy and Precision Compatibility and File Formats (import & Export) Collaboration and Sharing Automatation Cost & Licensing

Acredito que as principais características que devam ser buscadas em um software é o desempenho e compatibilidade, pois facilidade de uso pode ser resolvido com profissionais qualificados ou instru??o e recursos adicionais vêm em forma de plugins se necessário, já desempenho e compatibilidade s?o cruciais para agilidade (ainda mais para arquivos muito grandes) e integra??o de um projeto.

Uma ferramenta deste tipo deve ser capaz de reutilizar vários tipos de blocos configurados pelo utilizador para garantir uma otimiza??o dos passos necessários ao desenvolvimento do trabalho. Também é importante que a ferramenta possua uma boa base de MACROS e de atalhos para que o processo seja o mais fluido possível.

When selecting 2D CAD software for a team, the process typically involves evaluating factors such as specific project requirements, ease of use, robust drafting tools, compliance with industry standards, collaboration features, scalability, training/support resources and cost effectiveness to ensure seamless integration with existing workflows and efficient project delivery.

When it comes to 2D drafting, would prefer AutoCAD (if it’s affordable). It’s widely used in academia and also in industry, and is easy to use for 2D sketches such as shop drawing.

Die Behauptung, dass DraftSight kostenlos sei, ist falsch. DraftSight war lange Zeit kostenlos für Linux und Windows erh?ltlich, ist aber schon seit mehreren Jahren kostenpflichtig. Die Preise orientieren sich an der Ausbaustufe und dem Lizenztyp (standalone, floating, Miete). DraftSight bietet eine gewohnte Arbeitsumgebung erg?nzt diese jedoch um moderne Werkzeuge (kreismenü, intelligentes trimmen, intelligente Bema?ung etc. )

Apart from the aforementioned software, there are others like BricsCAD and free draft (which is an open source software) that offer the same efficiency as AutoCAD. They can work with blocks, arrays, layers and other tools that are necessary in drafting.

La opción más económica y potente del mercado es BricsCAD te la opción de tener licencia en propiedad o bajo renta a diferentes plazos, además es muy amigable y es compatible con todos los formatos 2D, incluso tiene la posibilidad de 3D para partes, ensambles y Sheetmetal.

GstarCAD es otra platafroma de dise?o asistido por computadora (CAD) que se utiliza para crear dibujos técnicos en 2D y modelos tridimensionales en 3D. Es una alternativa a otros programas de CAD populares, como AutoCAD, DraftSight, etc. GstarCAD ofrece diversas herramientas y funciones para facilitar el dise?o y la documentación técnica en diversas industrias, como la arquitectura, la ingeniería y la construcción. Cuando la conocí por primera vez tenia mis dudas debido a que es un software chino, pero quede muy sorprendido al ver que tiene las mismas capacidades que AutoCAD, además, los precios para licenciamiento son muy bajo. Saludos

Na minha opini?o é importante utilizar um software que se comunique com outros softwares, que tenha op??o de importar e exportar de forma eficiente e correta, isso proporciona uma melhor integra??o do projeto n?o apenas com as pessoas da própria empresa, mas com outras envolvidas no projeto. O AutoCad é o mais utilizado justamente por ser o mais difundido e integrado nessa parte.

I would consider the nature, scope, and intricacy of the projects my team works on when selecting 2D CAD software. Whichever it is, I would choose the software. The ease of use and time consumption would be the next prerequisite in light of everything above.?Another thing to consider is how stable it is when managing a lot of drawings. What sophisticated features does it have, and how does it handle importing and exporting different file formats?

Es importante conocer las capacidades electrónicas de tu equipo, los requerimientos que exigen estos softwares de dise?o asistido suelen ser por lo menos un buen procesador junto a chip de video.

Solidwork est logiciel de Conception Assisté par Ordinateur Pour le FAO on utilise le Mastercam est bon logiciel pour tournage cnc

When taking softwares into consideration, make sure your team is dynamic enough to adapt to the changes that the software will bring. Hiring experts makes it even easier for choice of software.

Teams often face limitations in software choice due to widespread use of a particular option, which may not be the most proficient for a specific industry or country. Therefore, selecting the best software should primarily hinge on its ability to effectively handle file formats used by both the new software and counterparts or external teams.

Optimization of 2D softwares should be done with a wide range of options in view. This is because, teams will handle different projects in future and hence the need to be versatile in software usability.

If it's possible set up custom keyboard shortcuts. If it's possible set up custom keyboard shortcuts. If it's possible set up custom keyboard shortcuts.

Les outils paramétriques sont très efficaces pour augmenter la productivité. Je ne connais que l'Autocad. Les blocs paramétriques peuvent aider à automatiser le processus

Debe admitir la carca de script que permitan personalizar y automatizar tareas, enriqueciendo el flujo de trabajo con esas mejoras.

Unfortunately in the construction market 2D cad is not as relevant anymore ( I was an old Cad guy). But it has been replaced by Revit and 3D products due to the its additional functionality for coordination of trades. Auto-cad is still used for things such as 2D details and schedules but they are then brought into Revit for compiling the drawing sets.

While I agree that Revit and BIM workflows have largely replaced CAD, Rhino is still a highly valuable cad program to use alongside/inside BIM/Revit. Rhino is a 3d cad software that has all the 2d functions of Acad and other 2d CADs. It is a powerful schematic tool for realizing formal ideas for a project. Design groups that skip the formal generation capabilities and design flexibility of CADs are seriously undercutting the potential for a project. I strongly believe that Revit should be avoided early in the design process as it is too restrictive/unimaginative; rather, a tool like rhino is highly productive for the testing and Inquisition that set trajectory for a good design.

The most underrated aspect of drawing is work flow. It is what most supports efficient, error free work that can be leveraged across softwares to create useful deliverables.

En el sector de la construcción y más en concreto el de la ferralla, son muchas las empresas que trabajan con sistemas CAD, y lo seguirán haciendo por varios a?os. Ninguno de ellos está desarrollado para el cálculo de las armaduras de los planos estructurales del proyecto y elaboración de la lista de barras, muy importante para su posterior importación a un software ERP. Es por eso muy importante conocer y ayudar a desarrollar plugins especializados en el sector de la ferralla. Tenemos varios como VilaCad, Graphico Pro o RebarScan. Estos no solo son capaces de hacer importaciones directas de diferentes elementos del proyecto como losas, vigas o pilares sino de calcular elementos geométricos a partir de informaciones preestablecidas.

For infrastructure projects, 3D CAD such as MicroStation provides enhanced visualisation, accurate design analysis, improved collaboration through referencing, interoperable export and import capabilities, and optimised reporting. Its advanced capabilities help improve decision-making, reduce errors and facilitate efficient project execution from design through to long-term maintenance.