What is the most effective way to select a scale for a geological map?

1 Scale definition

The scale of a map is the ratio between the distance on the map and the corresponding distance on the ground. For example, a scale of 1:50,000 means that one centimeter on the map represents 50,000 centimeters (or 500 meters) on the ground. The scale can also be expressed as a fraction, such as 1/50,000, or as a verbal statement, such as "one centimeter to 500 meters". The scale can be shown on the map using a scale bar, a graphic element that indicates the distance on the ground for a given length on the map.

2 Scale selection

The scale of a geological map depends on several factors, such as the size and complexity of the area to be mapped, the purpose and audience of the map, the availability and quality of data, and the resources and time available for the mapping project. Generally speaking, the smaller the scale, the larger the area covered by the map, but the less detail and accuracy it can show. Conversely, the larger the scale, the smaller the area covered by the map, but the more detail and accuracy it can show. Therefore, the scale of a geological map should reflect a balance between the level of detail and accuracy needed for the intended use of the map, and the practical constraints and limitations of the mapping process.

3 Scale examples

There is no fixed rule or standard for choosing the scale of a geological map, but there are some common scales that are widely used for different types of geological maps. For example, regional geological maps, which show the broad geological features and patterns of large areas, such as continents, countries, or provinces, usually use small scales, such as 1:1,000,000 or 1:2,500,000. These maps are useful for providing an overview of the geology of a region, and for identifying large-scale geological structures, trends, and relationships. However, they cannot show much detail or variation in the local geology, and they may have significant errors or uncertainties due to the lack of data or the generalization of data.

On the other hand, local geological maps, which show the detailed geology of small areas, such as towns, villages, or sites, usually use large scales, such as 1:10,000 or 1:5,000. These maps are useful for providing a detailed and accurate picture of the geology of a specific location, and for identifying small-scale geological features, such as faults, folds, contacts, and rock types. However, they cannot show the regional context or the wider implications of the local geology, and they may require a lot of data and fieldwork to produce.

Between these two extremes, there are intermediate scales, such as 1:100,000 or 1:50,000, which are often used for sub-regional or district geological maps. These maps are useful for providing a compromise between the regional and the local perspectives, and for showing the main geological features and characteristics of an area, such as the stratigraphy, the lithology, the structure, and the mineralization. However, they may still have some limitations or trade-offs in terms of the detail and accuracy of the map, depending on the data availability and quality, and the mapping methods and techniques.

4 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?