What are the most effective tools for measuring resilience in coaching?

Testing for resilience puts people in boxes. It compares them with societal averages. I prefer a more personalised approach, looking at the individual without the comparison. Doing tests like this overlooks that true innovation often arises from those who don't fit conventional molds. What happens if they don't score inside the resilience box? Will they then need to 'work' to become 'good enough'? History shows many breakthroughs stem from unique perspectives, not from those who fall within the normal. Celebrating their unique way of being resilient, drawing that out via conversation rather than confining them to rigid resilience tests, could benefit the person, and the organisation, much more.

La Escala de Resiliencia es una herramienta que permite medir la capacidad de adaptarse y recuperarse frente a las adversidades y situaciones estresantes. Conocer nuestro nivel de resiliencia puede ser beneficioso tanto a nivel personal como profesional. Aplicar estrategias basadas en la resiliencia en el día a día, ha de ser un proceso gradual y personalizado, ya que cada persona tiene sus propias circunstancias y objetivos.

Je pense qu'il y a des choses qui se vérifient dans la discussion en direct avec la personne. A-t-il/elle déjà eu des occasions dans sa vie de rebondir après un échec, une étape difficile ? Quelles sont les compétences qu'il/elle a activées? Quel temps de conjugaison utilise-t-il/elle quand il/elle parle de la situation (but amener la personne à parler au présent pour vérifier ici et maintenant son envie de changer et d'avancer) Se connaissant (il ou elle-même) que risque-t-il/elle de faire pour empêcher que ?a change ? Quels sont les éléments de son écologie personnelle qui seront touchés par un changement (ex. relation avec ses proches) ? bref voici jusque quelques pistes utiles dans le dialogue en direct de mon point de vue.

Sowohl die Resilienz-Skala wie auch die Connor-Davidson-Skala sind annerkannte und wohl erprobte Tools, welche eine Aussagekraft über die Resilienz eines Klienten geben k?nnen. Gleichzeitig ist es meiner Meinung nach jedoch wichtig, die jeweilige Person als Individuum zu betrachten und die spezifische Situation hinzu zu ziehen. Menschen verhalten sich abh?ngig von ihrem emotionalen Involvement sehr verschieden und k?nnen eine erstaunliche Resilienz zeigen, wenn dies gefordert ist und sie es selbst als n?tig empfinden. Generell darf hinterfragt werden, inwiefern die Einteilung von Menschen gem?ss einer Skala der tats?chlich m?glichen Resilienz entspricht und aufgrund von Bias nicht gar kontraproduktiv in der Arbeit als Coach wirken kann.

I think personally from my experience its far more beneficial to actually teach people about how their mind works and give them tools to improve how they use it every day. If people are always testing people it just makes them feel stuck that they only got a certain score. Give people belief in themselves, show them what they can do to improve how they feel, respond and take action.

The CD -RISC requires a real buy in from leadership to ensure that psychological safety through the process . Communicating the benefits of assessing employee resilience and how it can contribute to a healthier and more productive work environment is pivotal to its effectiveness. Assuring employees that their responses on the CD-RISC will be kept confidential and will not have any unwanted impact on their employment would help in building trust and encourage honest and open participation so that the organisations gains a deeper understanding of employees' resilience levels. Importantly, pproaching the assessment process with sensitivity, respect for privacy, and a commitment to using the insights gained should be key

This report consist of self-report questionnaire that measures resilience across five dimensions: personal competence, high standards and tenacity, trust in one's instincts, positive acceptance of change and secure relationships.

I absolutely love the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). For one, it is a widely used instrument designed to measure an individual's level of resilience, second, it comprises 25 items that assess various factors related to resilience, such as adaptability, optimism, and the ability to bounce back from adversity. Coaches and consultants often use the CD-RISC to gain a comprehensive understanding of a client's resilience, identifying strengths and areas for development. By analyzing the output, coaches can tailor their strategies to enhance the client's ability to navigate challenges, cope with stress, and maintain well-being.

Incorporate CD-RISC strategically in your coaching process by interpreting the results within a personalized context. Identify specific factors contributing to resilience and tailor coaching interventions accordingly. Encourage clients to reflect on each factor, fostering self-awareness and targeted development. Additionally, use the CD-RISC as a benchmark for progress, periodically reassessing resilience to track advancements and refine coaching strategies. This comprehensive approach enhances the tool's effectiveness in promoting enduring resilience.

Es importante que tengas la claridad del estado emocional de tu coachee antes de realizar esta prueba, en el caso de que este con estrés o ansiedad, sus respuestas pueden reflejar temporalmente un nivel de resiliencia diferente al habitual.

Let's ditch the heavy resilience manuals and empower our teams with this bite-sized tool. By embracing the BRS, we can cultivate a culture of resilience, where challenges become opportunities, setbacks become stepping stones, and our team emerges unbreakable, ready to conquer any obstacle.

Utilize its simplicity by incorporating it regularly in your coaching sessions to monitor immediate and forward-looking resilience. Encourage clients to delve into specific situations where they've demonstrated resilience, fostering self-reflection. Additionally, leverage the BRS as a conversation starter, prompting clients to explore strategies that contribute to their bounce-back and bounce-forward abilities. By integrating the BRS seamlessly into coaching discussions, you can enhance its impact on resilience awareness and development.

The Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) primarily relies on self-reporting, which can be subjective and influenced by individual perception. This subjective nature may lead to variations in how individuals interpret and respond to the scale, potentially affecting the accuracy of resilience assessment.

Pros of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS): It's a concise and easy-to-administer self-report questionnaire, making it efficient for quick assessments. It measures an individual's ability to bounce back from stress effectively, making it suitable for various applications. Cons: It provides a limited view of resilience and may not capture all dimensions. As with all self-report scales, it relies on individuals' self-perceptions, which can introduce subjectivity and potential bias.

Although all these scales seek to assess an individual's ability to recover from and adapt to disruptions or stressful events, the BRS directly measures one's ability to bounce back or be resilient.

It’s crucial to be aware of how the four dimensions influence the measurement of resilience. In order to become more resilient, one can work on the domain with the lowest score while focusing on one’s strengths to get there faster.

Si vous privilégiez l'inventaire du quotient de résilience, c'est une approche valable. Cet outil mesure spécifiquement les compétences liées à la résilience, offrant une évaluation détaillée. Complétez cette méthode en intégrant des retours d'autres angles, tels que des évaluations de performance et des entretiens qualitatifs, pour une vue plus holistique. La combinaison d'indicateurs concrets et d'observations directes peut renforcer la validité de l'évaluation. En résumé, utiliser l'inventaire du quotient de résilience peut constituer un élément clé dans une approche diversifiée pour mesurer la résilience en coaching.

Leverage its depth by using it as a framework for tailored coaching discussions. Guide clients in exploring specific aspects within each domain, fostering a nuanced understanding of their resilience profile. Encourage clients to set targeted goals for enhancing confidence, adaptability, purpose, and social support. The RQi's personalized feedback can serve as a roadmap, aligning coaching strategies with individual resilience needs for optimal results.

The Resilience Quotient Inventory (RQi) is designed to measure resilience in individuals. One potential drawback is that, like many self-report assessments, it relies on individuals' self-perceptions. This can introduce subjectivity and may not fully capture external factors or behaviors that contribute to resilience. Additionally, individuals might provide responses based on social desirability, potentially impacting the accuracy of the results.

The Resilience Quotient Inventory (RQi) is valuable for its comprehensive and nuanced approach to measuring resilience. Unlike binary assessments, RQi delves into multiple dimensions, offering a detailed understanding of an individual's resilience. Its applicability extends to both personal and organizational contexts. For individuals, it provides insights into strengths and areas for improvement, guiding tailored interventions. In organizations, it assesses collective resilience, informing leadership on targeted programs. The RQi stands out for its practicality, offering actionable feedback and recommendations, making it not just a diagnostic tool. Overall, the RQi is a versatile and effective tool for assessing and enhancing resilience.

When working with my clients, the Resilience Questionnaire (RQ) offers more than metrics; it serves as a conversation starter, uncovering the unique ways individuals face challenges. The insights gained from the RQ inform the coaching dialogue, enabling a deeper exploration of a client's resilience journey. By integrating the RQ's findings with personal narratives, we collaboratively craft bespoke resilience strategies that resonate with their lived experiences. This personal touch not only validates their struggles but also celebrates their growth, making the RQ a transformative tool in their path to personal and professional empowerment.

Leverage the RQ results to initiate targeted discussions. Work collaboratively with clients to cultivate and refine these strategies, tailoring them to individual preferences and contexts. Encourage clients to integrate resilience-building practices into their routines, fostering sustainable personal growth and adaptability.

Si vous considérez le questionnaire sur la résilience comme un moyen efficace, cela peut fournir des insights utiles. Cependant, il est important de combiner cela avec d'autres approches, comme des entretiens qualitatifs pour une compréhension approfondie. Assurez-vous d'intégrer des méthodes variées telles que des feedbacks à 360 degrés, des évaluations de performance et des observations directes pour obtenir une perspective complète de la résilience. Adaptabilité face à l'adversité, évaluée par des outils tels que le CD-RISC, peut être un aspect clé de la mesure. En somme, diversifier les méthodes permet d'obtenir une évaluation plus nuancée de la résilience en coaching.

The Resilience Questionnaire is like your own guide to inner strength. Each question is an opportunity to think/ reflect about your experiences and how you've overcome challenges. The answers create a special picture of clients resilience – how to bounce back and keep going. It's not just about answering; it's telling the story of your ability to learn and grow. This questionnaire isn't a test; it's a tool showing the unique resilience that's part of who you are. Use it as a way to understand and take care of the strong, resilient client requirements

Fragebogen sollten keinen "Brockhaus-Charakter" haben. Wenn sie kurz und pr?gnant sind, k?nnen sie zum Beginn eines Coachings für den Klienten und den Coach als Entree gute Dienste leisten. Ist es für uns Menschen doch einfacher im Vergleich zu etwas anderem uns eine Meinung zu bilden, als eine Aussage, die allein da steht zu beurteilen. Im agilen Projektmanagement wird diese F?higkeit u. a. genutzt.

In my experience, resilience can be measured if one adopts consistent behaviors to achieve own goals. The frequency, the overcoming of challenges no matter what, the ability to mobilize support, the establishment of alternative options are among the behaviors observed in resilient people. Also resilience is different than persistence and perseverance…Persistency and perseverance have in common the repeat of same actions to achieve own goals. Resilience may require shifts, tacks, creativity to face unexpected challenges, uncertainty and obstacles.

Todos tenemos una herida profunda y hemos salido adelante, o pasado por cambios profundos; medir la resiliencia ayuda, sin embargo, espero que no condicione otros aspectos.Todos tenemos la capacidad de adaptarnos y superarnos en conciencia. Para mi más valioso son aquellas herramientas que tienes para superar esos dolores, frustraciones y sobreponerte a una derrota o pérdida.

From my personal experience, there is no scale that can measure resilience in a way that is person-centred, useful in a messy world or reflective of what being resilient really means. I accept they can provide a score for a particular point in time but that in no way helps when you are hit by adversity. As someone who has faced significant adversity in my life and who sees themself as a reasonably resilient individual, find a scoring system of no meaningful value; either reflecting on those experiences and how I might have coped better or on my ongoing journey of building my resilience. An immersive, personal and practical approach is how I work with clients. This enables people to build a plan to become better able to cope with adversity.

We tend to think about resilience as the skill required to get back up and take action. The most resilient people I know take it a notch deeper and incorporate rest and time for cognitive consolidation as well. Resilience often requires a gap between what we've learned and what we intend to do with those lessons. There's a lot of guilt and shame, for many, when it comes to rejuvenation but it is an essential part of a healthy creator's process and crucial to our ability to rise and try again.

I believe resilience is a double-edged sword and by teaching resilience and scoring it, we can actually be pushing people toward burnout. Individuals need to be able to overcome adversity and get through to the other side. However, when individuals create a power-through mentality, they often aren't in touch with their own personal needs. Measuring resilience is an independent assessment because every person's personal tolerance is different. Instead of metrics, we coach by understanding the individual and creating small habit changes and mindset shifts to build resilience based on their individual 'scale'. Just like the way we teach in school, it isn't one size fits all, resilience cannot be either.