登录查看更多内容

What is the most effective method for measuring surface area in material characterization?

由人工智能和领英社区提供技术支持

Surface area is a key parameter in material characterization, as it affects the reactivity, adsorption, catalysis, and transport properties of solids. However, measuring surface area is not a straightforward task, as different methods may yield different results depending on the nature and structure of the material. In this article, you will learn about the most effective method for measuring surface area in material characterization, based on the principles, advantages, and limitations of each technique.

此文章中的业界达人

由社区从 3 条内容中精选。了解更多

Dr Abhijit Roy

Research Management Lead @ Q-LineBiotech, | IITK | IISc | MIT USA | Technopark IIT Kanpur | PhD | Educator | Inventor|…

1 Gas adsorption

Gas adsorption is the most widely used and reliable method for measuring surface area in material characterization. It involves exposing a sample of the material to a gas, usually nitrogen, at low temperature and high pressure, and measuring the amount of gas that is adsorbed on the surface. The adsorption isotherm, which plots the amount of gas adsorbed versus the relative pressure, can be used to calculate the surface area using various models, such as the Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) equation. Gas adsorption can measure both the external and the internal surface area of porous materials, as well as the pore size distribution and volume.

添加您的观点

Dr Abhijit Roy

Research Management Lead @ Q-LineBiotech, | IITK | IISc | MIT USA | Technopark IIT Kanpur | PhD | Educator | Inventor| Futurist | Soft Electronic Skin, BIO-MEMS, Telemedicine, Soft Robotic, AI, 3D printing
举报内容
I think, overall, gas adsorption is the most effective method for measuring surface area in material characterization for most materials. However, the best method for a particular experiment will depend on the specific requirements of the experiment.

已翻译

赞

2 Mercury porosimetry

Mercury porosimetry is another method for measuring surface area in material characterization, especially for materials with large pores and high porosity. It involves forcing mercury into the pores of the material under high pressure, and measuring the volume of mercury that is intruded. The intrusion curve, which plots the volume of mercury intruded versus the applied pressure, can be used to calculate the surface area using the Washburn equation. Mercury porosimetry can measure the total surface area and the pore size distribution of the material, but it cannot measure the external surface area or the mesopores (pores with diameters between 2 and 50 nanometers).

添加您的观点

Dr Abhijit Roy

Research Management Lead @ Q-LineBiotech, | IITK | IISc | MIT USA | Technopark IIT Kanpur | PhD | Educator | Inventor| Futurist | Soft Electronic Skin, BIO-MEMS, Telemedicine, Soft Robotic, AI, 3D printing
举报内容
Advantages: High accuracy and precision: Mercury porosimetry is a very accurate and precise technique. Wide range of pore sizes: Mercury porosimetry can measure a wide range of pore sizes, from micrometers to millimeters. Non-destructive: Mercury porosimetry is a non-destructive technique, meaning that the sample can be reused after the test. Disadvantages: Limited to non-wetting liquids: Mercury porosimetry can only be used with non-wetting liquids, such as mercury.High cost and Environmental concerns. In conclusion, mercury porosimetry is a powerful technique for characterizing the pore size distribution, pore volume, and porosity of solid materials. However, it is important to be aware of its limitations and hazards before using it.

已翻译

赞

3 Optical microscopy

Optical microscopy is a simple and direct method for measuring surface area in material characterization, especially for materials with smooth and regular surfaces. It involves magnifying the image of the material using a microscope, and measuring the dimensions of the surface using a scale or a software. Optical microscopy can measure the external surface area of the material, but it cannot measure the internal surface area or the pores. Moreover, optical microscopy has a limited resolution and accuracy, and it may be affected by the shape and orientation of the material.

添加您的观点

Dr Abhijit Roy

Research Management Lead @ Q-LineBiotech, | IITK | IISc | MIT USA | Technopark IIT Kanpur | PhD | Educator | Inventor| Futurist | Soft Electronic Skin, BIO-MEMS, Telemedicine, Soft Robotic, AI, 3D printing
举报内容
Advantages: Simple and direct method Suitable for materials with smooth and regular surfaces Can measure the external surface area Easy to operate and requires minimal sample preparation Disadvantages: Limited resolution and accuracy Cannot measure internal surface area or pores Affected by the shape and orientation of the material May not be suitable for rough or complex surfaces May be time-consuming for large samples

已翻译

赞

4 Other methods

There are other methods for measuring surface area in material characterization, such as thermal conductivity, electrical conductivity, and laser diffraction, but they are less common and less accurate than the methods described above. These methods are based on the assumption that the surface area of the material is proportional to some physical property that can be measured, such as heat transfer, electrical resistance, or light scattering. However, these methods are sensitive to many factors, such as temperature, humidity, particle size, and composition, and they may not account for the porosity or the roughness of the material.

添加您的观点

5 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

添加您的观点

Chemical Engineering

+ 关注

给文章评分

我们借助人工智能创建了此文章。您认为这篇文章怎么样？

很棒不太好

举报此文章

查看全部

What is the most effective method for measuring surface area in material characterization?

1

2

3

4

5

1 Gas adsorption

2 Mercury porosimetry

3 Optical microscopy

4 Other methods

5 Here’s what else to consider

Chemical Engineering

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

更多Chemical Engineering相关文章

更多相关阅读内容