What do you do if your storytelling lacks logical reasoning?

Start by critically analyzing your story to pinpoint where the logical connections between ideas, arguments, or events might be weak or missing. This involves looking for jumps in reasoning, unsupported statements, or conclusions that don't follow from the premises. Experience Sharing: Inviting contributions here could lead to discovering common types of logical gaps that professionals encounter and strategies they've used to identify these gaps effectively.

Let go! A story is your imagination! A news report must follow the demands of who, what, where and when. In the realm of storytelling, imagination reigns supreme. Stories transport us to distant worlds, introduce us to unforgettable characters, and evoke a myriad of emotions. They are flights of fancy, untethered from the constraints of reality. In contrast, news reports adhere to a strict code of objectivity and accuracy. They present facts, not fiction. News reporters, should be tasked with informing the public about current events, and their reports must answer the essential questions of who, what, where, and when.

Challenge your story by asking probing questions about every assertion and logical connection. Questions like "Why does this matter?", "How do we know this?", and "What evidence supports this?" can reveal areas that need bolstering. Experience Sharing: Contributions might include specific questions that have proven especially helpful or techniques for questioning one's work critically.

Having colleagues or peers review your story can provide fresh perspectives and help uncover logical flaws you might have missed. Peer review is invaluable for challenging your reasoning and assumptions. Experience Sharing: Here, journalists could share how peer review processes have improved their work and tips for giving and receiving constructive feedback

If your peers struggle to follow the story's story line. It's not a story. And, you should know this before this point of presentation.

If an aspect of your article can't be directly linked to another point, it doesn't need to be there, no matter how interesting it is. Once you figure out how each piece of data links to the others, it should be clear how it needs to be structured. Ideally it should be a continuous flow of logic, but you can call back to previous points if absolutely necessary.

Based on the gaps identified and feedback received, be prepared to rewrite sections of your story. This might involve restructuring your narrative, providing additional context, or clarifying your reasoning. Experience Sharing: Insights could focus on effective rewriting strategies, how to stay open to significant changes, and maintaining the core message while enhancing logical flow.

Complex ideas can often be a source of logical breakdowns in storytelling. Break down complex concepts into simpler, more digestible parts without oversimplifying. Use analogies, examples, and clear, straightforward language to make your reasoning more accessible. Experience Sharing: Journalists could share examples of complex stories they simplified without losing depth and the techniques they used.

Be open to changing your story’s direction based on the logical coherence and feedback. This flexibility can be crucial for ensuring that your narrative remains logically sound as you refine it. Experience Sharing: This could include anecdotes about how being flexible allowed for uncovering more compelling or accurate stories.

Verify and Cite Sources: Ensuring that your information comes from reliable sources and that you cite these sources transparently can strengthen your story's logical underpinnings. Use Data Wisely: Data can powerfully support your narrative but ensure it is relevant, accurately represented, and interpreted with care. Understand Your Audience: Tailor your logical reasoning to the knowledge level and interests of your audience. This can help make complex information more relatable and your logic more persuasive.