What do you do if your colleague's code is not up to par?

You should always provide constructive feedback to your colleague okay and also you can help or offer assistance for improvement and make sure that to be with the alignment with coding standards and project requirements through open communication.

If a colleague's code isn't meeting standards: Offer constructive feedback, focusing on specific issues. Suggest improvements or alternative approaches. Encourage collaboration and offer support. Advocate for code reviews to maintain quality. Mentor or provide resources for skill enhancement. Communicate concerns respectfully to foster a positive work environment

Tactfully address subpar code from colleagues to enhance overall project quality. "In the confrontation between the stream and the rock, the stream always wins - not through strength, but through perseverance." - H. Jackson Brown Misconception: Critiquing code may seem confrontational or unnecessary. Real Thing: Subpar code impacts project quality and team morale. Major Problem: Unaddressed code issues lead to project delays and technical debt. Solution: Offer specific feedback for improvement. Collaborate to resolve issues and share best practices. Lead by writing clean, maintainable code. Provide resources for skill development. Important Tips: Be respectful and empathetic in code reviews. Focus on critiquing the work,

Peer Review is a must. We must review each other's code and identify the issues in there. We must give constructive feedback and provide suggestions wherever possible. If possible we can also opt for Pair Programming. One thing we must be clear about is that Peer Review or Pair Programming should be treated and accepted as a scope for improvement, some people think this is looking down but thats not the case

When you encounter code from a colleague that doesn’t meet the expected standards, it’s essential to handle the situation professionally and constructively. Here are some steps to consider: Understand the Context Provide Constructive Feedback Code Review Process Highlight Best Practices Collaborate and Mentor Escalate if Necessary

Clear communication is vital when addressing code quality concerns. Privately approach your colleague, avoiding confrontation, and cite specific examples from the code to illustrate your points. Emphasize the necessity of potential changes, such as adding comments for clarity. Focus on the code's maintainability rather than personal criticism to foster a constructive dialogue and mutual understanding.

Providing resources can empower colleagues to enhance their coding skills autonomously. Recommend relevant books, online courses, or articles focusing on the specific areas needing improvement, such as algorithm optimization for inefficient algorithms. This approach encourages self-improvement and self-reliance, often yielding more effective results than direct instruction.

In my experience, it's very helpful to have code reviews done by other people on the team This work has many advantages, for example: Understanding teammates' handwriting and better understanding of codes Exchange knowledge and information and learn more from team members Transferring a sense of trust and positive energy to team members The possibility of providing better technical solutions and efficient improvements with the help of collective wisdom