登录查看更多内容

What do you do if conflicting information architecture decisions are hindering your UED work progress?

由人工智能和领英社区提供技术支持

When you're knee-deep in User Experience Design (UED), conflicting information architecture (IA) decisions can be a real roadblock. IA is the structural design of shared information environments; it's the art and science of organizing and labeling websites, intranets, online communities, and software to support usability and findability. But when IA decisions clash, your UED work can grind to a halt. So, what do you do when you're faced with this challenge? Let's explore some strategies to navigate through the confusion and keep your UED project on track.

在这篇协作文章中查找专家回答

由社区从 4 条内容中精选。了解更多

1 Assess Impact

Begin by evaluating the impact of the conflicting IA decisions on your project. Determine which areas of the user experience are affected and to what extent. This assessment will help you prioritize the issues that need immediate attention. Consider how these conflicts affect user navigation, content findability, and overall satisfaction. By understanding the consequences, you can make informed decisions about which battles are worth fighting and which can be compromised on for the greater good of the project.

添加您的观点

Sujatha Palanivel

Senior UI/UX Designer | User Experience Expert | UI/UX Design Strategist | Experienced UX Designer Specializing in DLT Solutions for Banking | Healthcare Solutions UX Designer | Usability Champion
举报内容
To assess the impact of conflicting information architecture decisions, start by identifying the affected areas using tools like Google Analytics to track user behavior and pinpoint patterns of high bounce rates or navigation errors. Conduct usability tests to observe user interactions and gather qualitative data on frustrations. Discuss the issues with stakeholders to understand their perspectives and assess how these conflicts impact business metrics like conversion rates and customer satisfaction. Prioritize the issues based on their severity and impact on user experience and business goals. Develop and implement a plan for the new IA, ensuring that the most critical conflicts are resolved first.

已翻译

赞

2 Gather Data

Your next step is to gather data to support your arguments for or against certain IA decisions. User testing, surveys, and analytics can provide valuable insights into how real users interact with the architecture. This empirical evidence is instrumental in resolving conflicts, as it shifts the conversation from subjective opinions to objective facts. When presenting this data to stakeholders, highlight the direct correlation between IA decisions and user behavior to underscore the importance of a cohesive approach.

添加您的观点

Sujatha Palanivel

Senior UI/UX Designer | User Experience Expert | UI/UX Design Strategist | Experienced UX Designer Specializing in DLT Solutions for Banking | Healthcare Solutions UX Designer | Usability Champion
举报内容
Combining qualitative and quantitative methods provides a comprehensive understanding of user behavior and needs. Employing a mix of methods such as user interviews, surveys, usability testing, contextual inquiry, and analytics helps gain a holistic understanding of users. When presenting data to stakeholders, focus on how the data impacts business goals and user experience. Using visuals like charts and graphs makes data more accessible and easier to understand. This approach ensures that design decisions are informed by robust data, aligning with both user needs and organizational objectives.

已翻译

赞

3 Engage Stakeholders

Engaging stakeholders is crucial in resolving IA conflicts. Arrange meetings with all parties involved to discuss the issues at hand. These discussions should be collaborative, not confrontational, focusing on the shared goal of enhancing the user experience. Encourage stakeholders to voice their concerns and ideas, fostering an environment of mutual respect. By involving everyone in the decision-making process, you're more likely to reach a consensus that aligns with your UED objectives.

添加您的观点

Sujatha Palanivel

Senior UI/UX Designer | User Experience Expert | UI/UX Design Strategist | Experienced UX Designer Specializing in DLT Solutions for Banking | Healthcare Solutions UX Designer | Usability Champion
举报内容
Involving stakeholders early and often can prevent conflicts in information architecture. Arrange regular meetings with all stakeholders to discuss IA issues and potential solutions. Use tools like Figma, which has commenting features for effective collaboration with stakeholders. All feedback and discussions are centralized within the design file, reducing the chances of miscommunication that can occur with email threads or separate feedback documents. Stakeholders can be involved throughout the IA and design process, providing input and approvals at various stages, which helps in aligning design decisions with business goals.

已翻译

赞

4 Explore Alternatives

If consensus seems out of reach, explore alternative IA solutions that may satisfy all parties. Sometimes a fresh perspective can reveal a middle ground that was previously overlooked. Consider creating multiple prototypes that incorporate different IA decisions and test them with users. This hands-on approach can often demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of each option more effectively than theoretical discussions.

添加您的观点

5 Implement Changes

Once a decision has been made, it's time to implement the changes to the IA. Ensure that all modifications are clearly documented and communicated to the entire project team. This transparency helps prevent future conflicts by keeping everyone on the same page. As changes are implemented, monitor user feedback and analytics closely to ensure that the new IA decisions are positively impacting the user experience as anticipated.

添加您的观点

6 Monitor Results

Finally, after implementing the new IA decisions, closely monitor the results to ensure they are delivering the desired improvements in user experience. Keep an eye on key performance indicators such as bounce rates, conversion rates, and user satisfaction scores. If the changes aren't meeting expectations, be prepared to iterate and refine the IA. Remember, UED is an ongoing process that requires flexibility and a willingness to adapt to new information.

添加您的观点

NIDA EMAN

Co-Founder UX Praxis || Behavioral Science Enthusiast
举报内容
Having it checked by more than one person works accuratey than single check. Becaue one can make biased decisions many can't.

已翻译

赞

7 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

添加您的观点

User Experience Design

+ 关注

给文章评分

我们借助人工智能创建了此文章。您认为这篇文章怎么样？

很棒不太好

举报此文章

查看全部

What do you do if conflicting information architecture decisions are hindering your UED work progress?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 Assess Impact

2 Gather Data

3 Engage Stakeholders

4 Explore Alternatives

5 Implement Changes

6 Monitor Results

7 Here’s what else to consider

User Experience Design

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

更多User Experience Design相关文章

更多相关阅读内容

What do you do if conflicting information architecture decisions are hindering your UED work progress?

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

1 Assess Impact

2 Gather Data

3 Engage Stakeholders

4 Explore Alternatives

5 Implement Changes

6 Monitor Results

7 Here’s what else to consider

User Experience Design

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

查看其他技能