What are the differences between transnational education and traditional education?

regarding my field as medical educator, I think the curricula should have both types. TNE will help students understand the global health problems and challenges. They can update their knowledge and keep up with the recent advances in medicine. They will have a background knowledge of diseases and vaccines all over the world; which will help a lot especially if they continue their post-studies abroad or intend to immigrate. traditional education is necessary for a deeper study of the national health status; which is a priority

TNE is gaining a significant popularity nowadays. Because of the emergence of globalization of markets and the intensive use of information technology as well as the Internet. As a result, education must shift to reflect this new direction. Thus, we have partnered with top leading American and European universities in form of joint degrees and programs to equip our graduates with the state of the are knowledge and skills so that they can be better placed to serve the employment needs of the global labor market. Globalization of education becomes a must; particularly with massive deployment of AI and online platforms of educational systems. There is no domestic education anymore and we have to seek building global mindset throughout TNE.

Who cares. This is just jargon to keep bureaucrats in jobs. We should glorify people who carry out research informed teaching.

TNE is indeed a veritable tool for the internationalization of knowledge especially across divides where such knowledge is low and highly required. It definitely holds very mutually beneficial advantages for economies where such knowledge may be required for economic growth and societal development. Many such knowledge in healthcare, engineering, tech., sciences have been transferred across divides to the advantage of the receiving economy. It also can provide cost-effective access to globalized learning.

Transnational education (TNE) encompasses various forms, each offering distinctive advantages. Branch campuses, established by universities and colleges in foreign countries, mirror the curriculum and standards of their parent institutions, enabling students to earn foreign degrees while remaining in their home countries. In the digital era, distance learning and online courses have transformed education, allowing students worldwide to participate in virtual classrooms, access educational resources, and collaborate with peers across the world. TNE fosters quality and diversity in education through initiatives like joint degree programmes, faculty exchanges, etc.

TNE fosters a global perspective by immersing students in diverse cultures, ideas, and teaching methods, nurturing cross-cultural understanding and better preparing graduates for the intricacies of our interconnected world. Secondly, TNE offers access to highly ranked institutions that might otherwise be out of reach for many students, marking a pivotal opportunity for those aspiring to receive a high-quality education. Lastly, with online and distance learning options, TNE provides the crucial flexibility necessary for students to pursue education while juggling work, family, and other commitments. These benefits collectively contribute to a more accessible, diverse, and globally engaged learning environment.

There are different ways and means of getting quality education , transnational edu is global education where education has been blended with different diversity and culture whereas traditional education ongoing process on a typical already practiced process

Transnational education (TNE) offers accessibility and flexibility, allowing students to study from anywhere and at their own pace. It promotes diversity by attracting students from various countries and can be more cost-effective, avoiding the need for physical relocation. TNE also provides a platform for global networking and lifelong learning, making it an appealing choice for many seeking convenient and innovative educational opportunities.

The quality and recognition of TNE programs can vary significantly, underscoring the importance of diligent research for students to select reputable institutions and programs that ensure a worthwhile educational investment. Cultural adaptation and language barriers can pose hurdles for students engaged in TNE, potentially affecting their overall learning experience. Additionally, navigating the diverse regulatory and legal frameworks in different countries is a paramount consideration for institutions offering TNE, as these intricacies can greatly influence the success and compliance of such programmes. It is imperative to address these challenges to maintain the integrity and effectiveness of transnational education initiatives.

Transnational education (TNE) faces multiple challenges, including ensuring consistent quality across borders, adapting to diverse cultures, and the recognition of qualifications. Technological and infrastructure barriers, time zone differences, and the absence of in-person interaction can also pose hurdles, while regulatory compliance, maintaining academic integrity, and offering robust student support are ongoing concerns. Overcoming these challenges is crucial for TNE providers to offer accessible and high-quality education to a globally diverse student population.

TNE stands out for its global accessibility and flexibility, allowing students to access international programmes from anywhere, often with online options that accommodate various life commitments. It offers exposure to diverse cultures and perspectives but requires careful scrutiny of programme quality and accreditation due to variations among providers. In contrast, traditional education offers the stability of established institutions and local recognition but typically necessitates physical presence and may lack the international exposure found in TNE.

Transnational education (TNE) and traditional education significantly differ in their delivery methods and locations. TNE offers remote and often online learning, accessible from anywhere, with flexible scheduling, while traditional education relies on physical campuses with fixed schedules. TNE is celebrated for its accessibility and diversity, yet faces challenges in recognition and quality assurance, while traditional education prioritizes in-person interaction and academic tradition but may be less flexible and accessible. Both models have their advantages and disadvantages, catering to a range of student needs and preferences.

I agree! TNE and traditional education in the academic advising field do also differ primarily in their geographic scope and delivery methods. Traditional education typically occurs within a single physical location of usually campus, while TNE involves educational programs delivered across national borders through partnerships or online platforms (specially in the covid and post-covid era). In the realm of academic advising, TNE introduces unique challenges, such as navigating diverse cultural contexts, understanding different educational systems, and meeting the students where they are in their education journey. However, it also offers distinct advantages, fostering global perspectives and enhancing cross-cultural communication skills.

Choosing between transnational education (TNE) and traditional education depends on individual circumstances and preferences. TNE is suitable for those seeking flexibility, accessibility, and the ability to study from anywhere, but it may require more self-discipline. Traditional education offers in-person interaction and a structured campus experience but may involve higher costs and less flexibility. Consider factors like your learning style, career goals, and lifestyle to make the choice that aligns best with your needs and priorities. Some students even opt for a blend of both, benefiting from the strengths of each model.

Integrating both traditional and transnational academic advising specifically in the graduate school is essential for preparing students to thrive in an interconnected world. Traditional advising provides a foundation in local academic norms, while transnational advising equips students with the flexibility and cultural competence necessary for success in an increasingly globalized academic landscape. Together, they offer a comprehensive support system that addresses the complex needs of a diverse student body.

The UK and Latin America have a long history of collaboration in education and research. This collaboration has led to many successful outcomes, including the development of new curriculum and teaching methods, the advancement of research on important challenges University of Edinburgh and University of S?o Paulo: Joint PhD programme in climate change University of Oxford and National Autonomous University of Mexico: Joint research centre on energy Imperial College London and Pontifical Catholic University of Chile: Joint research centre on mining King's College London and University of Buenos Aires: Joint research centre on public health

Working as a professor in the Erasmus program, I found the greatest challenge to be the difference in pedagogic structures and requisite cultural expectations of students regarding what constitutes education rather than the students’ lived experience and actual outcomes achieved. I found this consistently with students from Estonia, Russia, Greece, and Germany in varying degrees. The approach that helped to somewhat ameliorate this was to critically contextualize each learning instance, apply experiential learning and curricular adaptations wherever possible, and solicit different modes of feedback from students frequently. The years I taught in this way resulted in the most significant outcomes students and institutions had achieved.