登录查看更多内容

What are the best ways to resolve disputes between architects and engineers?

由人工智能和领英社区提供技术支持

Architects and engineers often work together on complex projects that require creativity, technical expertise, and coordination. However, sometimes they may disagree on design decisions, specifications, methods, or costs. These disputes can cause delays, conflicts, and dissatisfaction among the project stakeholders. How can you avoid or resolve them effectively? Here are some best practices to follow.

此文章中的业界达人

由社区从 5 条内容中精选。了解更多

Dharmendra Kumar

System Design Manager || Rail Design || Rolling Stock || TCMS || Tender || Train Schematics || Perf Cal || Propulsion…
Sekonyela Thantsi

Corporate Attorney -Compliance Management-Land and Deeds registration Specialist - Estate Planning- Trusts- Bonds…

1 Communicate clearly and frequently

Communication is key to any successful collaboration, especially between architects and engineers who have different perspectives and priorities. You should communicate your expectations, assumptions, constraints, and feedback clearly and frequently throughout the project. Use common language, avoid jargon, and confirm understanding. Use appropriate tools and formats, such as drawings, models, reports, or meetings, to convey your information and ideas. Listen to each other's opinions and concerns, and respect each other's expertise and experience.

添加您的观点

Dharmendra Kumar

System Design Manager || Rail Design || Rolling Stock || TCMS || Tender || Train Schematics || Perf Cal || Propulsion Equipment Design || BOI Engg || RAMS || Trained for train || Vande-Bharat/EMU/MEMU/ Metro || Loco
举报内容
The best way to avoid conflict between architect and engineers to communicate clearly and frequently with reference to requirement, expectation and constraints. ?? key factors considered for communication are: 1. Both are working for common projects and respect each other's expertise and concern. 2. Requirement should be clearly define. 3. There should not be any conflict between requirement and expectation. If so then it should be properly documented. 4. If any constraints & assumption arises to meet requirement. Then it should be clearly communicated with each other. Point should be clearly defined with proper Technical document. 5. Use common format and language to avoid conflict. 6. Listen opinion and concern of each other.

已翻译

赞

2 Establish roles and responsibilities

To avoid confusion and overlap, you should define and agree on the roles and responsibilities of each party at the beginning of the project. Who is the lead designer, who is the consultant, who is the reviewer, who is the approver? What are the scope, deliverables, and deadlines of each task? How will you coordinate and communicate with each other and with other stakeholders? How will you handle changes and revisions? Having a clear and documented agreement can help you avoid misunderstandings and disputes later on.

添加您的观点

Dharmendra Kumar

System Design Manager || Rail Design || Rolling Stock || TCMS || Tender || Train Schematics || Perf Cal || Propulsion Equipment Design || BOI Engg || RAMS || Trained for train || Vande-Bharat/EMU/MEMU/ Metro || Loco
举报内容
It is important to define clearly scope, deliverables, timelines between two parties to avoid conflict at later stage, resulting the delay of complete project. Following points to be considered for agreement between two parties are: 1. Define clearly roles and responsibility of each party with respect to work responsibility. 2. Deliverables and scope between two parties are clearly defined . 3. Timelines & deadlines to be defined for each activity and milestone 4. Way of communication & between two parties should be defined properly, so that communication happens in efficient manner to avoid any conflict. Communication matrix to be defined for each activities and role. 5. Resolution process is defined if conflict arises.

已翻译

赞

3 Seek compromise and consensus

Sometimes, you may encounter situations where you have different opinions or preferences on how to achieve the project goals. For example, you may disagree on the aesthetic, functional, or structural aspects of the design, or on the choice of materials, systems, or techniques. In these cases, you should try to find a compromise or a consensus that satisfies both parties and meets the project requirements. You should focus on the problem, not the person, and use objective criteria and evidence to support your arguments. You should also consider the impact of your decisions on the project budget, schedule, quality, and safety.

添加您的观点

Dharmendra Kumar

System Design Manager || Rail Design || Rolling Stock || TCMS || Tender || Train Schematics || Perf Cal || Propulsion Equipment Design || BOI Engg || RAMS || Trained for train || Vande-Bharat/EMU/MEMU/ Metro || Loco
举报内容
Suppose opinion of one party changes during execution of the project with respect to functionality, implementation techniques, system requirement design and asthetics. To meet the project requirement and goals due to change in opinion, Both parties should agreed to make a way or compromise to meet the project requirement and timelines. The most important thing to consider the impact on the project with respect to project budget, schedule, quality and safety. This impact should clearly defined between both parties and action from both sides to be documented. Action plan is clearly defined in the document to expedite the execution and meet the projet timelines and milestone.

已翻译

赞

4 Involve a third party

If you cannot reach a compromise or a consensus on your own, you may need to involve a third party to help you resolve the dispute. This could be someone from the project team, such as the project manager, the client, or another expert, who can provide guidance, mediation, or arbitration. Alternatively, you could seek external assistance from a professional association, a dispute resolution service, or a legal advisor, depending on the nature and severity of the dispute. The third party should be impartial, knowledgeable, and respectful of both parties' interests and rights.

添加您的观点

5 Learn from the experience

Finally, you should learn from the experience of working with architects or engineers and use it to improve your future collaborations. You should reflect on what went well and what went wrong, and identify the causes and consequences of the disputes. You should also solicit and provide feedback to each other, and acknowledge and appreciate each other's contributions. You should use the lessons learned to avoid repeating the same mistakes, to enhance your skills and knowledge, and to build trust and rapport with your colleagues.

添加您的观点

加载更多内容

6 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

添加您的观点

Sekonyela Thantsi

Corporate Attorney -Compliance Management-Land and Deeds registration Specialist - Estate Planning- Trusts- Bonds Securities registration
举报内容
Objectivity should be at the heart of every dispute resolution irrespective of area of expertise. The other important consideration is knowledge of industry practices in order to make appropriate decisions which should align with the goals and objectives of the project. Contractual obligations are vital to determine and better appreciate the cause of the dispute. It is also important to avoid legal jargon to enhance effective communication between the parties. The decision should also be communicated in a language better understood by the parties.

已翻译

赞

Engineering Design

+ 关注

给文章评分

我们借助人工智能创建了此文章。您认为这篇文章怎么样？

很棒不太好

举报此文章

查看全部

What are the best ways to resolve disputes between architects and engineers?

1

2

3

4

5

6

1 Communicate clearly and frequently

2 Establish roles and responsibilities

3 Seek compromise and consensus

4 Involve a third party

5 Learn from the experience

6 Here’s what else to consider

Engineering Design

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

更多Engineering Design相关文章

更多相关阅读内容

What are the best ways to resolve disputes between architects and engineers?

1

2

3

4

5

6

1 Communicate clearly and frequently

2 Establish roles and responsibilities

3 Seek compromise and consensus

4 Involve a third party

5 Learn from the experience

6 Here’s what else to consider

Engineering Design

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

查看其他技能