How would you address conflicting feedback from bilingual reviewers during the quality assurance process?

2 Analyze Feedback

Once you've acknowledged the reviewers' expertise, it's time to analyze the feedback. Look at the specific points of contention and assess whether the feedback is subjective or if it stems from a misunderstanding of the source material. Consider the target audience and the purpose of your translation. Is the feedback relevant to the context? Does it enhance the accuracy and readability of your translation? Careful analysis will help you decide which suggestions to incorporate.

3 Communicate Clearly

Effective communication is key in resolving conflicts. Reach out to your reviewers and discuss the feedback. Explain your translation choices and understand their reasoning. This dialogue can often clarify misunderstandings and highlight aspects of the translation that may need adjustment. Clear communication not only helps in resolving the current conflict but also prevents similar issues in future projects.

5 Consider Compromise

Sometimes, finding a middle ground is the best solution. If the conflicting feedback doesn't involve factual inaccuracies or critical misinterpretations, consider a compromise that incorporates elements from both sets of feedback. This approach can often lead to a more nuanced and well-rounded translation, satisfying both reviewers and meeting the project's objectives.

6 Make Decisive Choices

Ultimately, you may need to make decisive choices when integrating feedback. After considering all perspectives, it's your responsibility to decide which changes will improve the translation. Trust your judgment and make choices that align with the project's goals, audience, and context. Remember, a translation is a balance between fidelity to the source text and adaptation to the target culture.

7 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?