How do you write code faster without sacrificing quality in programming interviews?

In my experience, if you keep practicing, you will notice that on the interview you very likely will encounter a similar case to some you already seen. This will make you feel much more comfortable and ready for it.

I totally agree to this because practicing regularly can also boost our problem-solving abilities. It's like solving puzzles, we get better at it with time and experience. ???? Personally, I prefer to set aside dedicated time for practice. It's like having a study schedule, it keeps we on track and helps to make steady progress. ???? So, remember, practice makes progress in the world of coding!

In my case when Im going to have a technical interview I always try to practice using leetcode, I have been in cases in which I get asked to resolve a problem I have already completed while practicing in leetcode. It's also important to think before actually doing some code, you can star by writing some pseudo code so you can start having some ideas on how to tackle the problem.

Learn to identify which algorithm to use for the type of question. One of the biggest keys is being able to identify the algorithm. Then, practice solving these algorithm problems. Do not try to focus on the number of challenges - focus on understanding the solution completely. Then, try the exact same questions again after a couple of days. This method helps you identify how well you understood the solution and to identify which areas slow you down and require improvement.

In my experience, it's like laying out the plan in plain language, step by step, without getting bogged down by the specifics of actual code. ?? One might be following an old saying: "Measure twice, cut once." In programming, pseudocode is good way of measuring before to start cutting code. It's like having a rough draft of an essay. You jot down your ideas, see if they make sense, and refine them before crafting the final masterpiece. ??? So, whenever I tackle a coding challenge, I personally prefer to start with pseudocode. It's a valuable tool in my coding toolbox!

Yes, it's essential to maintain a clean and organized codebase. It's much easier to find what you need when everything has its place. One might be following: "A place for everything, and everything in its place." In coding, it translates to structured and well-documented code. ???? I totally agree to this because good coding standards not only make our code look pretty, but they also make it more understandable for me and our fellow developers. ?????? Personally, I prefer to stick to coding standards right. It's like building a strong foundation to ensures stability as you add more features.

I try to use sample unit and run the program manually or trace the algorithms for its correctness. At times correct and bug free code has more value than very time efficient solution.

One might be following a checklist of things to look out for during code review: functionality, readability, efficiency, and maintainability. I totally agree to this because code review is a collaborative effort. It's like having a second pair of eyes on your code, and it can catch things you might have missed. ???? Additionally, I always prefer to refactor code when I spot an opportunity. It's like tidying up our desk; it makes our workspace more efficient and pleasant to work in.

In my experience, its better to do dry run the algorithm once you are done and before you would ask for the feedback. This can be de done during pseudo code phase as well but must be done before you ask for feedback or let interviewer know its done. At times writing bug free code is important during such interviews.