How do you prioritize testing and validation?

1 Risk-Based Prioritization

One of the most widely used methods for prioritizing testing and validation is to assess the level of risk associated with each feature, function, or component of the software product. Risk can be defined as the probability and impact of failure, defect, or error that could affect the quality, performance, security, or reliability of the product. Risk-based prioritization involves identifying and ranking the most critical and vulnerable areas of the product that need more testing and validation, and allocating more time, resources, and attention to them. Risk-based prioritization can help reduce the likelihood and severity of failures, defects, or errors, and improve customer satisfaction and trust.

2 Value-Based Prioritization

Another method for prioritizing testing and validation is to evaluate the value or benefit that each feature, function, or component of the software product provides to the customers and stakeholders. Value can be measured by the extent to which the product meets the needs, expectations, and preferences of the target users, and how it enhances their experience, satisfaction, and loyalty. Value-based prioritization involves identifying and ranking the most important and desirable areas of the product that need more testing and validation, and allocating more time, resources, and attention to them. Value-based prioritization can help increase the quality, usability, and functionality of the product, and improve customer retention and advocacy.

3 Urgency-Based Prioritization

A third method for prioritizing testing and validation is to consider the urgency or deadline of each feature, function, or component of the software product. Urgency can be influenced by factors such as market demand, competitive pressure, customer feedback, regulatory compliance, or contractual obligations. Urgency-based prioritization involves identifying and ranking the most time-sensitive and time-critical areas of the product that need more testing and validation, and allocating more time, resources, and attention to them. Urgency-based prioritization can help deliver the product on time, on budget, and on scope, and avoid delays, penalties, or reputational damage.

4 Feasibility-Based Prioritization

A fourth method for prioritizing testing and validation is to account for the feasibility or practicality of each feature, function, or component of the software product. Feasibility can be affected by factors such as technical complexity, resource availability, testing environment, testing tools, testing techniques, or testing skills. Feasibility-based prioritization involves identifying and ranking the most feasible and realistic areas of the product that can be tested and validated effectively and efficiently, and allocating more time, resources, and attention to them. Feasibility-based prioritization can help optimize the testing and validation process, and achieve the best possible results with the given constraints.

5 Scenario-Based Prioritization

While the above methods can provide general guidelines for prioritizing testing and validation, they may not be sufficient or suitable for every situation. Therefore, it is also important to adapt and adjust the prioritization criteria and strategy based on the specific context, goals, and challenges of each testing and validation scenario. For example, some scenarios may require a combination of different methods, such as risk-value, value-urgency, or risk-urgency prioritization. Some scenarios may also require a dynamic and flexible prioritization approach, such as agile, iterative, or adaptive prioritization, that can respond to changing requirements, feedback, or conditions. Scenario-based prioritization involves analyzing and understanding the unique characteristics and requirements of each testing and validation scenario, and applying the most appropriate and effective prioritization method and strategy for it.

6 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?