Static analysis is a method of examining malware without executing it, by inspecting its code, structure, and metadata. However, some malware authors use techniques such as packing, polymorphism, and metamorphism to obfuscate their code and evade detection. How do you handle these challenges in static analysis? Here are some tips and tools to help you.
Packing is a technique that compresses or encrypts the malware code and adds a stub or loader that unpacks or decrypts it at runtime. This makes the code unreadable and reduces its size, making it harder to identify by signature-based scanners or manual analysis. To handle packed malware, you need to identify the packing algorithm and the unpacking routine, and then either extract the original code or debug it in a controlled environment. Some tools that can help you with this task are PEiD, UPX, and OllyDbg.
10K+ @Linkedin Family | Lead DevOps | Cloud Architect | Cyber Security Professional
Packed malware employs encryption or compression techniques to obfuscate its true intent. Static analysis of packed malware involves unpacking the code to reveal its underlying structure. Techniques like control flow analysis and signature matching can help identify known packing algorithms, but custom or unique packers pose a greater challenge. Automated unpacking tools and sandbox environments can aid in the analysis of packed malware.
Employing your chosen sandbox distribution along with static debugging tools such as IDA PRO, OllyDbg, or Immunity Debugger is recommended for dynamic analysis. In cases of packed code, attempts can be made to unpack it using commercial tools like UPX; however, if unsuccessful, hence studying anti-debugging and anti-reversing techniques, checking the static code for indicators such as long jump instructions or small mathematical routines, and employing various tactics to identify the complexities of the packed code.
Handling packed, polymorphic, and metamorphic malware in static analysis can be challenging due to their techniques to obfuscate their code and evade detection. Use tools like PEiD or Exeinfo PE to identify the packer used in the malware. Use Automated Unpacking Tools, Leverage tools like OllyDbg, x64dbg, or similar debuggers with unpacking plugins. Some specialized tools like PE-sieve or Scylla can help automate the unpacking process. Always use unpacking tools responsibly and in a controlled environment. Additionally, keep in mind that the effectiveness of unpacking tools can vary based on the complexity of the packer or protector used by the malware.
Polymorphism is a technique that changes the appearance of the malware code without altering its functionality, by using encryption, randomization, or substitution. This creates multiple variants of the same malware that have different signatures, making it harder to detect by static analysis. To handle polymorphic malware, you need to analyze the encryption key and the decryption routine, and then either decrypt the code or trace its execution. Some tools that can help you with this task are IDA Pro, x64dbg, and Ghidra.
10K+ @Linkedin Family | Lead DevOps | Cloud Architect | Cyber Security Professional
Polymorphic malware continually changes its code while preserving its functionality. It's like a chameleon that adapts to its environment. To analyze such malware statically, machine learning algorithms can be used to detect patterns in the code's behavior and structure. Feature extraction, statistical analysis, and neural networks are valuable tools in identifying polymorphic traits. Continuous updates to detection algorithms are necessary to keep up with the ever-evolving nature of polymorphic malware.
Polymorphic malware undergoes dynamic changes in its code structure or appearance each time it infects a new host. This transformation occurs without altering the underlying functionality. It often uses various obfuscation techniques, such as encryption, code reordering, or instruction substitution, to create multiple, slightly altered versions of itself and Polymorphic malware aims to evade signature-based detection by generating unique instances that do not match known malware signatures. Traditional antivirus solutions rely on predefined signatures to identify malicious code.
Metamorphism is a technique that changes the functionality of the malware code as well as its appearance, by using reordering, rewriting, or inserting junk code. This creates new versions of the malware that have different behavior and logic, making it harder to analyze by static or dynamic methods. To handle metamorphic malware, you need to compare the code segments and identify the common patterns, and then either reverse engineer the code or emulate it. Some tools that can help you with this task are BinDiff, Radare2, and QEMU.
10K+ @Linkedin Family | Lead DevOps | Cloud Architect | Cyber Security Professional
Metamorphic malware takes shape-shifting to the extreme, rewriting its entire code every time it infects a new target. Static analysis of metamorphic malware requires sophisticated methods, including abstract interpretation and symbolic execution. These techniques aim to understand the malware's behavior at a high level, focusing on its logic rather than its specific code. Reverse engineering and emulation can also be combined to extract meaningful insights from metamorphic malware.
Metamorphic malware goes beyond simple code rearrangement; it transforms its underlying algorithms and logic dynamically. This includes changes to control flow, data flow, and other fundamental aspects of the code and frequently incorporates self-modifying techniques where the code modifies itself during execution. This self-modification can include altering opcodes, rearranging instructions, or changing memory addresses.
Static analysis is a valuable skill for malware analysts, but it requires practice and patience. To hone your static analysis skills, you should become familiar with the basics of assembly language and common malware architectures. Additionally, you should get acquainted with the tools and techniques for disassembling, debugging, and decompiling malware. Additionally, keeping yourself updated with the latest malware trends and samples is important. Furthermore, challenging yourself with different levels of difficulty and complexity of malware samples can help you improve your skills. Lastly, sharing your findings and feedback with other malware analysts in the community can also be beneficial.
Gain proficiency in the programming languages commonly encountered in malware and security analysis, such as Python, C, and assembly languages. Regularly review open-source projects to understand different coding styles, structures, and common practices. Learn assembly language to understand how programs interact with hardware at a low level. Start for this tools: - DIE or PEiD - PEview - PEstudio - CFF Explorer - IDA Pro - Ghidra
Static analysis is not a perfect method and has some limitations and drawbacks. To avoid pitfalls and mistakes in static analysis, you should verify your assumptions and hypotheses with multiple sources and methods. It is also important to be aware of the anti-analysis techniques used by malware authors to deceive or hinder your analysis. Additionally, consider the legal and ethical implications of handling malware samples and their data. Protect your system and network from infection or compromise by using isolated or virtualized environments, and document your process and results for future reference and improvement.
IMO, the most common mistake in static malware analysis is blindly trusting what the tools (disassemblers, decompilers, de-packers, etc.) show us. In my research, I showed how malware could mess with the output of widespread tools (IDA, Ghidra, radare2, yara, etc.) by forging out-of-specs PE headers [1]. One way of getting genuine and precise results is combining different tools (e.g., comparing the disassembled output of two tools instead of solely relying on one). I also advise malware analysts to combine static and dynamic techniques to establish a more trustworthy knowledge base of malware samples' behaviors. [1] Nisi et al., Lost in the Loader: The Many Faces of the Windows PE File Format @ RAID21
Static analysis is a crucial aspect of malware analysis, and avoiding pitfalls and mistakes is essential for accurate and reliable results. Always combine automated tools with manual inspection and analysis. Verify automated findings and cross-reference results from multiple tools. Identify and unpack compressed or packed sections using appropriate tools. Understand common packer and compressor signatures and techniques. Be aware of common anti-analysis techniques, such as checks for virtualized environments or sandboxes. Use techniques to bypass or mitigate anti-analysis measures. Avoiding these pitfalls involves a combination of experience, continuous learning, and a meticulous approach to analysis.
If you want to get started with static analysis, you should find a reliable source of malware samples, such as VirusTotal or MalwareBazaar. Additionally, choose a suitable tool or platform for static analysis, such as REMnux or FLARE VM. To gain more knowledge on the topic, follow tutorials or guides that explain the basic steps and concepts of static analysis, like Practical Malware Analysis. To connect with other malware analysts, join online forums or groups that discuss and share malware analysis topics, including Reddit's r/Malware and Stack Exchange's Reverse Engineering.
The best way to learn static malware analysis is by... not starting with malware analysis at all. Make sure first to learn the basics of software reverse engineering and get comfortable reading and understanding assembly code. For example, write a small program in C/C++, compile it, and look at the resulting binary with IDA, r2, or any other disassembler. Repeat the process with more complex programs until you properly understand the ins and outs of executables (code/data segmentation, imports/exports, syscalls/API, etc.). Only once you master these should you approach malware. Get one from vx-underground and disassemble it. Chances are, it won't look like the programs you were trained on, but you'll have the basis to understand its tricks.
Leveraging threat intelligence feeds, sharing knowledge, and collaborating with other security professionals or organizations can enhance the ability to detect and analyze packed, polymorphic, or metamorphic malware. By leveraging shared information and expertise, it becomes easier to identify known techniques and apply appropriate countermeasures.
In summary, polymorphism in the context of malware is a technique that enables the code to shape-shift, making it difficult for traditional detection methods to identify and block the malware based on static signatures and metamorphic malware takes the obfuscation concept to the next level by dynamically altering not only its appearance but also its underlying algorithms and logic. This advanced form of obfuscation is designed to thwart detection by constantly presenting new, unique variants of the malware. Security measures must employ dynamic and behavior-based detection methods to effectively counter metamorphic threats.