How do you design and analyze lattice-based zero-knowledge proofs and protocols?

1 Lattices and hard problems

A lattice is a set of points in a multidimensional space that can be obtained by adding integer multiples of some fixed vectors, called basis vectors. Lattices have many interesting properties and can be used to represent various mathematical objects, such as polynomials, matrices, and codes. Some of the hard problems on lattices that are relevant for cryptography are the shortest vector problem (SVP), the closest vector problem (CVP), and the learning with errors problem (LWE). These problems are believed to be hard even for quantum computers, and can be used to build secure cryptographic primitives.

2 Zero-knowledge proofs and protocols

A zero-knowledge proof is a method of proving a statement to a verifier without revealing any other information. For example, you can prove that you know a password without disclosing it, or that you have a solution to a Sudoku puzzle without showing it. A zero-knowledge protocol is a sequence of interactions between a prover and a verifier that involves zero-knowledge proofs. For example, you can use a zero-knowledge protocol to authenticate yourself to a server, or to perform a secure computation with another party. Zero-knowledge proofs and protocols have many applications in cryptography, such as privacy-preserving identification, anonymous credentials, verifiable computation, and blockchain.

3 Lattice-based zero-knowledge proofs

One way to construct lattice-based zero-knowledge proofs is to use the Fiat-Shamir heuristic, which transforms an interactive protocol into a non-interactive proof by replacing the verifier's challenges with hash values. The basic idea is to use lattice-based commitments, which are ways of hiding a secret value in a lattice, and to use lattice-based trapdoors, which are special basis vectors that allow the prover to efficiently compute the secret value. The prover can then use the commitment and the trapdoor to generate a proof that satisfies the hash value, and the verifier can check the proof by using the public parameters of the commitment and the hash function.

4 Lattice-based zero-knowledge protocols

Another way to construct lattice-based zero-knowledge protocols is to use the Sigma protocol framework, which is a generic way of designing interactive protocols that have three rounds: the prover sends a commitment, the verifier sends a challenge, and the prover sends a response. The Sigma protocol framework can be instantiated with various lattice-based problems, such as SVP, CVP, and LWE, and can be used to prove various statements, such as linear relations, quadratic relations, and modular relations. The Sigma protocol framework can also be combined with other techniques, such as homomorphic encryption, oblivious transfer, and garbled circuits, to achieve more complex functionalities, such as secure two-party computation and multi-party computation.

5 Security and efficiency analysis

To analyze the security and efficiency of lattice-based zero-knowledge proofs and protocols, we need to consider several aspects, such as soundness, zero-knowledge, completeness, and complexity. Soundness means that the verifier will reject a false statement with high probability, zero-knowledge means that the verifier will learn nothing beyond the validity of the statement, completeness means that the verifier will accept a true statement with high probability, and complexity means that the prover and the verifier will use reasonable amounts of computation and communication. To prove these properties, we need to use various tools, such as reduction arguments, simulation arguments, hardness assumptions, and concrete parameters. We also need to compare the performance of lattice-based zero-knowledge proofs and protocols with other alternatives, such as elliptic curve-based or hash-based ones.

6 Challenges and opportunities

Lattice-based zero-knowledge proofs and protocols are still an active area of research, and there are many challenges and opportunities for further development. Some of the challenges are to improve the security proofs, to reduce the proof sizes and the communication costs, to optimize the implementation and the benchmarking, and to address the practical issues, such as standardization, interoperability, and deployment. Some of the opportunities are to explore new applications, such as verifiable delay functions, zero-knowledge contingent payments, and decentralized identity, to leverage new techniques, such as fully homomorphic encryption, lattice-based signatures, and lattice-based obfuscation, and to integrate with other domains, such as machine learning, blockchain, and quantum computing.

7 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?