How do you choose the best fault location method for HV cables?

1 Fault location methods

There are many fault location methods available for HV cables, but they can be broadly classified into two categories: offline and online methods. Offline methods require isolating the cable from the power source and injecting a test signal, such as a low-frequency or high-frequency current or voltage, to detect the fault location. Online methods use the existing voltage and current measurements from the cable terminals or sensors along the cable to determine the fault location. Offline methods are more accurate and reliable, but they also require more time, equipment, and manpower. Online methods are faster and simpler, but they also have more limitations and uncertainties.

2 Factors to consider

When choosing the best fault location method for HV cables, you need to consider several factors, such as the type and severity of the fault, the length and configuration of the cable, the availability and quality of the measurements, the cost and complexity of the equipment, and the safety and environmental issues. For example, if the fault is a high-resistance or intermittent fault, you may need to use an offline method with a high-frequency signal to locate it. If the cable is long or branched, you may need to use an online method with a traveling wave or impedance-based algorithm to locate it. If the measurements are noisy or distorted, you may need to use an offline method with a low-frequency signal or an online method with a filtering or compensation technique to locate it.

3 Common offline methods

HV cable fault location can be done using several offline methods, such as time-domain reflectometry (TDR), bridge methods, and Murray and Glaser loops. TDR injects a low-frequency pulse into the cable and measures the time and amplitude of the reflected pulse at the injection point. Bridge methods use a bridge circuit to balance the resistance or capacitance of the cable sections before and after the fault. Murray and Glaser loops use two identical cables connected in series or parallel to form a loop, with fault location estimated by measuring the voltage or current at different points of the loop. The fault location is calculated based on the propagation velocity and reflection coefficient of the cable for TDR, and by adjusting bridge parameters until balanced for bridge methods, while for Murray and Glaser loops it is determined by measuring voltage or current.

4 Common online methods

HV cable fault location can be achieved through various online methods, such as impedance-based methods, traveling wave methods, and artificial intelligence methods. Impedance-based methods calculate the impedance or admittance of the cable from voltage and current measurements at one or both ends of the cable. Traveling wave methods detect the arrival time and polarity of the traveling waves generated by the fault, then compute the fault location from the arrival time and wave velocity of the cable. Artificial intelligence methods use machine learning or expert systems to analyze voltage and current measurements and identify the fault location based on predefined rules or trained models.

5 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?