How can you write a powerful critical review conclusion?

There are two crucial parts of the conclusion and these are: summarizing the main ideas and give a future statement. It is very helpful to summarize the main ideas. It gives the audience what to remember from the topic. Then conclude with what you think after giving the all lot of information. Give a future predictions that shows your thoughts and where you are standing. The audience are more likely for forgot the topic but make it impossible to forget about the main ideas through giving a proper and memorable conclusion.

A conclusion should include, maybe at the very end, a few paragraphs explaining the issues you have NOT mentioned and the points you have NOT touched on in your critical assessment, in addition to summarizing your main points. This is crucial for two reasons. The first is sincerity. The second is to present the reader with opportunities to build his or her own thoughts on the issue.

It is important to restate a thesis without weakening or changing it. In my few time I've spend with my fellow students, one thing I've discovered is that a thesis is not an easy thing to write. A thesis is different from a topic sentence. The topic sentence is the topic of the paragraph and it is within the paragraph to declare what the subject is. On the other hand, though it is similar to the topic sentence, because it also declares the topic of the paragraph however, the thesis declares the the argument of an essay. A thesis statement, by definition, it has to be an argument.

Instead of restating your thesis, it is worthwhile to be critical of your own critique and highlight some of your thesis's weaker parts. This is difficult, but it is necessary because what you are doing is a subjective evaluation of someone else's ideas, not eradicating a heresy in the service of orthodoxy.

The key objective here is to inspire the reader to raise new questions and potentially generate new research agendas. Your text should not close the reader's mind, but rather open it up to new ways of thinking about the topic you discussed in your review.

This part shows your deep understanding on the particular topic. You should indicate what the results mean and explain the overall outcome of the study for future contribution,. improvement or study. Talk about the specific research you were doing and other research in the future. In tue world of Health, all of our findings are left open for reviews from other experts. They should be open for improvement or as a contribution to the existing research.

Your concluding sentence should be clear and emphatic, but not too hard or dogmatic. It should not sound as if you have simply said the final word on the subject.

This shows your thinking on the particular topic and it can be a further productions or under a call for action. It should show the implications to the area of study.

If you can demonstrate that you are conscious of your own flaws and inadequacies, and if you can make your own critique, then the readers will find your critical review more intriguing and compelling.

In the academic world, sometimes students get confused when they come across the term "leterature review". Let me mention it here that, literature review is simply a collected body of scholarly works that are rested to the topic. It can be an article or a book in academic journals. When we are told to review a certain literature, we are simply told to find a previous published scholarly works, if not given, that are relevant to the topic you want to do a research on. It therefore requires you to gather information from previous published journals that are in line with your topic and use critical thinking in bringing them together. This helps to keep to date with current findings and it can help to develop a new research question.