登录查看更多内容

How can you identify pore pressure anomalies and trends using well logs?

由人工智能和领英社区提供技术支持

Pore pressure is the pressure of the fluids in the pores of a rock formation, and it is a critical parameter for safe and efficient drilling operations. Abnormal pore pressure, which is higher or lower than the normal hydrostatic pressure, can cause drilling problems such as kicks, blowouts, lost circulation, stuck pipe, or wellbore instability. Therefore, it is important to identify and monitor pore pressure anomalies and trends using well logs, which are measurements of the physical properties of the formation and the fluids obtained by various tools and sensors in the wellbore. In this article, we will discuss some of the common methods and indicators of pore pressure analysis using well logs.

此文章中的业界达人

由社区从 7 条内容中精选。了解更多

Bo Henk
Nitish Srivastava

Drilling Engineer | Oil & Gas | Energy | Well Engineering | Well Design | Well Planning
Dr. Ahmed Abdelaziz Ibrahim Elrayah

1 D-exponent method

One of the simplest and most widely used methods of pore pressure prediction using well logs is the D-exponent method, which is based on the assumption that the drilling rate decreases as the pore pressure increases. The D-exponent is calculated as: D = log (ROP / WOB ^ 0.5) / log (12 / DB) where ROP is the rate of penetration, WOB is the weight on bit, and DB is the bit diameter. The D-exponent is then compared with a normal trend line, which is derived from empirical or theoretical models, to estimate the pore pressure. A higher D-exponent indicates a higher pore pressure, and vice versa. However, the D-exponent method has some limitations, such as the dependence on drilling parameters, lithology, and bit type, and the need for calibration with other data sources.

添加您的观点

Nitish Srivastava

Drilling Engineer | Oil & Gas | Energy | Well Engineering | Well Design | Well Planning
举报内容
Identifying pore pressure anomalies and trends using well logs is a crucial task in the oil and gas industry. Pore pressure refers to the pressure exerted by fluids within the pores of a rock formation. Anomalies or deviations from the expected pore pressure can have significant implications for drilling operations. Here are some common methods and considerations for identifying pore pressure anomalies and trends using well logs: Mud Weight Window Analysis: Compare the mud weight used during drilling with the expected pore pressure. A narrow mud weight window may indicate overpressured zones (pore pressure higher than expected) or underpressured zones (pore pressure lower than expected).

已翻译

赞
Dr. Ahmed Abdelaziz Ibrahim Elrayah
举报内容
Pore pressure is the pressure of fluids within a rock formation. It is an important factor in wellbore stability and drilling operations. Pore pressure anomalies and trends can be identified using well logs. These logs include sonic logs, density logs, neutron logs, gamma ray logs, and resistivity logs. Pore pressure anomalies and trends can be used to plan drilling operations, evaluate hydrocarbon reservoirs, and predict drilling hazards.

已翻译

赞
Mohamad AlKhatib

Senior Reservoir Engineer Management and Simulation at ADNOC Group
举报内容
While the D-exponent method offers a practical approach to pore pressure prediction, it's crucial to recognize its limitations. The dependence on drilling parameters, lithology, and bit type introduces variability, requiring careful calibration with additional data sources. This underscores the importance of integrating multiple methods and considering geological context for a more comprehensive understanding of subsurface conditions during drilling operations.

已翻译

赞

2 Sonic log method

Another common method of pore pressure prediction using well logs is the sonic log method, which is based on the observation that the compressional wave velocity of the rock decreases as the pore pressure increases. The sonic log measures the travel time of the sound waves through the formation, and it can be used to calculate the acoustic impedance, which is the product of the density and the velocity of the rock. The acoustic impedance is then compared with a normal compaction trend, which is derived from offset wells or regional data, to estimate the pore pressure. A lower acoustic impedance indicates a higher pore pressure, and vice versa. The sonic log method has some advantages, such as the independence from drilling parameters and the sensitivity to pore pressure changes, but it also has some challenges, such as the influence of lithology, fractures, gas, and mud filtrate invasion.

添加您的观点

Bo Henk
举报内容
This is one of the best tools for identifying shale source rock intervals that are thermally mature for oil and gas generation With depth and compaction the shale velocities increase in a linear fashion When they get into oil and gas window depths they deviate from the trend and show slower velocities The hydrocarbons in them slow down their velocities When you come out of the source rocks and into non source rock shales the velocities resume onto the compaction curve If you have digital logs use a GR cutoff value ( > 75 API) to identify the shale intervals that way you are not looking at other lithologies It works

已翻译

赞
Mohamad AlKhatib

Senior Reservoir Engineer Management and Simulation at ADNOC Group
举报内容
The sonic log method, with its independence from drilling parameters and sensitivity to pore pressure changes, indeed offers valuable insights. However, it's essential to acknowledge the challenges it poses, such as susceptibility to lithological variations, fractures, gas presence, and mud filtrate invasion. Integrating the sonic log results with complementary data sources becomes pivotal to enhance the accuracy and reliability of pore pressure predictions, emphasizing the need for a holistic and multidisciplinary approach in subsurface evaluations during well drilling.

已翻译

赞

3 Resistivity log method

A third method of pore pressure prediction using well logs is the resistivity log method, which is based on the fact that the electrical resistivity of the formation increases as the pore pressure increases. The resistivity log measures the ability of the formation to conduct electric current, and it can be used to calculate the water saturation, which is the fraction of the pore space occupied by water. The water saturation is then compared with a normal shale line, which is derived from a shale baseline or a shale point, to estimate the pore pressure. A higher water saturation indicates a lower pore pressure, and vice versa. The resistivity log method has some benefits, such as the availability in most wells and the detection of gas zones, but it also has some drawbacks, such as the dependence on salinity, temperature, clay content, and invasion zone.

添加您的观点

Mohamad AlKhatib

Senior Reservoir Engineer Management and Simulation at ADNOC Group
举报内容
The resistivity log method, with its widespread availability and capability to detect gas zones, presents a practical avenue for pore pressure assessment. Yet, it's important to consider its drawbacks, including sensitivity to factors like salinity, temperature, clay content, and invasion zone effects. To overcome these limitations, an integrated interpretation that combines resistivity log data with other geological and geophysical information becomes essential. This underscores the need for a comprehensive and context-aware approach, leveraging diverse datasets for a more nuanced understanding of subsurface conditions during well exploration and drilling.

已翻译

赞

4 Other log methods

Besides the three methods mentioned above, there are other methods of pore pressure prediction using well logs, such as the density log method, the neutron log method, the gamma ray log method, and the NMR log method. Each of these methods has its own advantages and disadvantages, and they can be used in combination or correlation with other methods to improve the accuracy and reliability of pore pressure analysis. Moreover, there are some indicators of pore pressure anomalies and trends that can be observed from well logs, such as the crossover of sonic and density logs, the reversal of resistivity and gamma ray logs, the separation of neutron and density logs, and the reduction of NMR porosity and permeability.

添加您的观点

Mohamad AlKhatib

Senior Reservoir Engineer Management and Simulation at ADNOC Group
举报内容
The diverse array of pore pressure prediction methods highlights the complexity of subsurface evaluations in the oil and gas industry. Integrating various log methods and recognizing pore pressure indicators is not just a technical necessity but also a strategic imperative. The synergy of these methods, when used judiciously, empowers geoscientists and drilling engineers to mitigate uncertainties and make informed decisions. In the evolving landscape of well log analysis, continuous exploration and refinement of these techniques contribute to advancing our understanding of subsurface dynamics, fostering a more resilient and efficient approach to energy resource extraction.

已翻译

赞

5 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?

添加您的观点

Drilling Engineering

+ 关注

给文章评分

我们借助人工智能创建了此文章。您认为这篇文章怎么样？

很棒不太好

举报此文章

查看全部

How can you identify pore pressure anomalies and trends using well logs?

1

2

3

4

5

1 D-exponent method

2 Sonic log method

3 Resistivity log method

4 Other log methods

5 Here’s what else to consider

Drilling Engineering

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

更多Drilling Engineering相关文章

更多相关阅读内容

How can you identify pore pressure anomalies and trends using well logs?

1

2

3

4

5

1 D-exponent method

2 Sonic log method

3 Resistivity log method

4 Other log methods

5 Here’s what else to consider

Drilling Engineering

给文章评分

感谢您的反馈

查看其他技能