How can you identify and overcome GIS myths?

1 Myth 1: GIS is only for maps

One of the most prevalent myths about GIS is that it is only for making maps. While maps are an important and visible output of GIS, they are not the only or the main purpose of GIS. GIS is a system that integrates data, software, hardware, and people to collect, store, analyze, and communicate spatial information. GIS can be used for a variety of applications, such as environmental management, urban planning, disaster response, health, education, and business. Therefore, GIS is not only for maps, but for solving problems and answering questions that have a spatial dimension.

2 Myth 2: GIS is too complicated and expensive

Another common myth about GIS is that it is too complicated and expensive to learn and use. This myth may stem from the perception that GIS requires advanced technical skills, specialized software, and expensive hardware. However, this is not necessarily true. GIS has become more accessible and affordable over the years, thanks to the development of open source software, online platforms, cloud computing, and mobile devices. There are also many resources and opportunities to learn GIS, such as online courses, tutorials, blogs, podcasts, and communities. Moreover, GIS does not have to be complicated if you start with the basics, focus on your needs and goals, and seek help when needed.

3 Myth 3: GIS data is always accurate and reliable

A third myth about GIS is that GIS data is always accurate and reliable. This myth may lead to overconfidence and misuse of GIS data, without considering its quality, limitations, and uncertainties. GIS data is not always accurate and reliable, because it is subject to errors, biases, gaps, and changes. GIS data can come from different sources, formats, scales, projections, and methods, which can affect its accuracy and reliability. Therefore, you should always evaluate and verify your GIS data before using it, by checking its metadata, documentation, currency, consistency, and validity.

4 Myth 4: GIS is a standalone system

A fourth myth about GIS is that GIS is a standalone system that does not need to interact with other systems or disciplines. This myth may limit the potential and value of GIS, by ignoring its connections and integrations with other fields and technologies. GIS is not a standalone system, but a part of a larger ecosystem that includes data science, remote sensing, web development, artificial intelligence, and more. GIS can benefit from and contribute to these fields and technologies, by sharing data, methods, tools, and insights. Therefore, you should always explore and embrace the opportunities and challenges of integrating GIS with other systems and disciplines.

5 Myth 5: GIS is a static and finished product

A fifth myth about GIS is that GIS is a static and finished product that does not need to be updated or improved. This myth may prevent you from keeping up with the changing and evolving nature of GIS, as well as the needs and expectations of your users and stakeholders. GIS is not a static and finished product, but a dynamic and ongoing process that requires constant maintenance, enhancement, and innovation. GIS is influenced by and responds to the changes and trends in the spatial world, such as new data sources, technologies, standards, and applications. Therefore, you should always monitor and evaluate your GIS performance, quality, and impact, and seek feedback and suggestions for improvement.

6 Myth 6: GIS is the same as GPS

A sixth myth about GIS is that GIS is the same as GPS. This myth may confuse you and others about the differences and relationships between these two acronyms. GIS stands for Geographic Information Systems, while GPS stands for Global Positioning System. GIS is a system that deals with spatial data and analysis, while GPS is a system that provides location and navigation services. GIS can use GPS data as an input, and GPS can use GIS data as an output, but they are not the same thing. Therefore, you should always clarify and distinguish between GIS and GPS when communicating with others.

7 Here’s what else to consider

This is a space to share examples, stories, or insights that don’t fit into any of the previous sections. What else would you like to add?